Observational studyBMJ paediatrics open2024
Developing a community-based model of care for venipuncture in children and young adults with an intellectual disability: a retrospective study.
Observational study in BMJ paediatrics open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRegular blood tests for monitoring metabolic side effects are often unable to be collected for people with an intellectual/developmental disability (ID/DD) and challenging behaviours (CBs) using usual pathways. We aimed to develop a model of care to facilitate venipuncture for children and young adults with ID/DD and CBs.
methodsA systematic tiered model of care was developed for venipuncture to suit the individual needs of children and young adults with ID/DD and CBs. A partnership was formed by the disability health team with a community pathology service provider. An observational retrospective study of the baseline demographic data, severity of disability and diagnosis, oral sedation requirement, and outcome data on the success/failure of venipuncture was done.
results14 children (mean (SD), 12.8 (3.1) years) had 17 attempted venipuncture with 'reasonable adjustments' such as preparation with social stories, distraction, low sensory strategies and oral sedation at school clinics. 14 (82%) attempts were successful. After the success of the pilot programme at school, venipuncture was replicated in settings such as home, day programmes, pathology centres and a respite facility. 16 people with ID/DD and CBs (mean (SD)17.3 (3.7) years), had 14 successful venipuncture performed out of 18 attempts (success rate, 77.7%). Overall, 11 attempts (31.4%) succeeded without requiring oral sedation using only reasonable adjustments. 16 attempts (45.7%) succeeded with conscious oral sedation along with reasonable adjustments. Of those 16, 10 required olanzapine (5 mg), 1 required olanzapine (10 mg), 1 required combination of risperidone (1 mg) and diazepam (5 mg), 1 required clonazepam (2.5 mg) and olanzapine (5 mg), 1 required combination of olanzapine (10 mg) and diazepam (10 mg), 1 required combination of olanzapine (10 mg) and diazepam (5 mg) while 1 required only diazepam (5 mg). One had to be switched to the tier-3 pathway.
conclusionA model of care was developed to ensure compassionate and non-stressful venipuncture for children and young adults with disabilities. We demonstrated that a significant proportion of carefully selected children and young adults with ID/DD and CBs, considered 'challenging for blood collection' can have venipuncture performed successfully in non-hospital settings using 'reasonable adjustments' and oral sedation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.