Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39097309›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Implementation of time-limited parenteral hydromorphone in people with treatment-resistant injecting opioid use disorder: a protocol for a single-site, uncontrolled, open-label study to assess feasibility, safety and cost.

Craig Rodgers, Krista J Siefried, Alison Ritter, Vendula Belackova, Carla Treloar, Marianne Jauncey, Nadine Ezard, Darren Roberts, Maureen Steele, Willem van den Brink and 5 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Craig RodgersAlcohol and Drug Service, St Vincent's Hospital Sydney, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia craig.rodgers@svha.org.au.ORCID 0009-0005-1777-2941
Krista J SiefriedAlcohol and Drug Service, St Vincent's Hospital Sydney, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6534-3325
Alison RitterDrug Policy Modelling Program, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Vendula BelackovaUniting MSIC, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Carla TreloarUniversity of South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8230-0386
Marianne JaunceyUniting MSIC, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Nadine EzardAlcohol and Drug Service, St Vincent's Hospital Sydney, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7495-8305
Darren RobertsAlcohol and Drug Service, St Vincent's Hospital Sydney, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia.
Maureen SteeleAlcohol and Drug Service, St Vincent's Hospital Sydney, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia.
Willem van den BrinkAmsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
John StrangAddictions, Kings College London, London, UK.
Eugenia Oviedo-JoekesUniversity of British Columbia Centre for Health Evaluation, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Nicholas LintzerisDiscipline of Addiction Medicine, University of Sydney, Surry Hills, New South Wales, Australia.
Adrian John DunlopDrug and Alcohol Clinical Services Research, Hunter New England Health, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
James BellUniversity of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSupervised injectable opioid treatment (SIOT) is an evidence-based intervention targeting opioid-dependent people for whom existing treatments have been ineffective. This project will primarily assess the feasibility and the acceptability of time-limited SIOT using injectable hydromorphone delivered in an existing Australian public opioid treatment programme, with secondary outcomes of safety, cost, changes in drug use and other health outcomes. If feasible, the goal is to scale up the intervention to be more widely available in Australia. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Between 20 and 30 participants will be offered two times per day hydromorphone to inject under direct observation, in addition to their current opioid agonist treatment (OAT), for up to 2 years. At the end of 2 years of supervised hydromorphone treatment, participants will be continued on standard OAT only. Informed consent will be obtained from all participants included in the study. This is a single-site, uncontrolled, open-label study where quantitative and qualitative interview data will be collected at baseline, 12 months and lastly at 3 months following their final hydromorphone dose. The main outcome measures are feasibility, as assessed by recruitment, retention and participation in treatment, and acceptability to participants, clinic staff and other stakeholders assessed by qualitative interviews. Secondary outcome measures of safety, as assessed by adverse events, and cost will also be assessed, as well as a range of other drug and health outcomes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study received ethical approval from the St Vincent's Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee (2019/ETH00418). This will be the first study of time-limited SIOT in the Australian setting. All results will be submitted to peer-reviewed journals, scientific conferences and local practice meetings. A preliminary report on outcomes will also be presented to local health policy makers. A consumer and community forum will also be held to feedback results to a broader audience. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12621001729819.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidHydromorphoneOpioid-Related DisordersAustraliaFeasibility StudiesHumansOpiate Substitution TreatmentSubstance Abuse, IntravenousAnalgesics, OpioidHydromorphonepublic healthqualitative researchsubstance misuse

Identifiers

PMID39097309
PMCPMC11298717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.