Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39096805›Full record

ArticleThe International journal on drug policy2024

Racial, ethnic, and neighborhood socioeconomic disparities in local cannabis retail policy in California.

Bethany J Simard, Alisa A Padon, Lynn D Silver, Lyndsay A Avalos, Aurash J Soroosh, Kelly C Young-Wolff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The International journal on drug policy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Local Cannabis Policy and Cannabis Use by California High School Students Before and After Statewide Retail Legalization.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bethany J SimardPublic Health Institute, Oakland, CA, United States. Electronic address: bsimard@phi.org.
Alisa A PadonPublic Health Institute, Oakland, CA, United States.
Lynn D SilverPublic Health Institute, Oakland, CA, United States.
Lyndsay A AvalosDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, United States.
Aurash J SorooshPublic Health Institute, Oakland, CA, United States.
Kelly C Young-WolffDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, United States.

Funding

Maternal Marijuana Use During Pregnancy, Marijuana Legalization, and Adverse Obstetrical and Neonatal Outcomes: A 12-year Cohort StudyR01DA047405 · NIDA · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI AVALOS, LYNDSAY AMMON, YOUNG-WOLFF, KELLY CORINNE · 2019 to 2023
$3.5M
Improving Influenza Vaccinations of Nursing Home StaffU01IP000035 · IP · PUBLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION ENTERPRISES · PI KIMURA, AKIKO C · 2004 to 2005
–
NCIRD CDC HHS U01 IP000035NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA047405
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPolicies governing legal cannabis commerce can vary widely within a U.S. state when local control exists. Disproportionate distribution of policies allowing retail sale, protecting public health, or promoting equity in licensing may contribute to differences in health and economic outcomes between sociodemographic subgroups. This cross-sectional study jointly examined racial, ethnic, and neighborhood socioeconomic characteristics of Californians subject to specific local cannabis policies to identify such disparities.

methodsLocal laws in effect January 1, 2020, governing retail cannabis sales (bans, expanding buffers from youth-serving sites, restricting advertising, promoting equity in licensing, and capping outlets) were determined for California's 539 jurisdictions. The number of Asian, Black, Latinx, and white residents in socioeconomic advantaged versus disadvantaged neighborhoods (Census block groups) was determined using 2015-2019 American Community Survey data. We estimated proportions of the sociodemographic subpopulations covered by specific policies based on the block group's jurisdiction. To ascertain disparities in coverage proportions were compared across subgroups using Z-tests with the Bonferroni correction.

resultsResidents of socioeconomically advantaged neighborhoods were more likely to live in jurisdictions allowing retail cannabis commerce than those in disadvantaged neighborhoods (61.7 % versus 54.8 %). Black residents in advantaged neighborhoods were most likely to live where retailing was allowed (69 %), and white residents in disadvantaged neighborhoods least likely (49 %). Latinx and Black populations from disadvantaged neighborhoods were most likely to live in jurisdictions with stronger advertising restrictions (66 %). Equity in licensing policy was more prevalent for Black residents living in advantaged neighborhoods (57 %) than disadvantaged neighborhoods (49 %).

conclusionsLocal cannabis policies potentially protecting public health and social equity are unequally distributed across race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic characteristics in California. Research examining whether differential policy exposure reduces, creates, or perpetuates cannabis-related health and socioeconomic disparities is needed.

Indexed as

CannabisCommerceEthnicityNeighborhood CharacteristicsSocioeconomic FactorsCaliforniaCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPublic PolicyRacial GroupsSocioeconomic Disparities in HealthCannabis policy disparitiesIntersectionality in drug policy researchLocal cannabis regulationsPublic health and cannabis distribution

Identifiers

PMID39096805
PMCPMC11392602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.