Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39096463›Full record

ReviewCurrent urology reports2024

Role of Genetic Testing in Kidney Stone Disease: A Narrative Review.

Robert Geraghty, Catherine Lovegrove, Sarah Howles, John A Sayer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current urology reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. [Reduced intestinal abundance ofNan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. [Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Robert Geraghty *Biosciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. rob.geraghty@newcastle.ac.uk.
Catherine Lovegrove *Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Sarah Howles *Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
John A Sayer *Biosciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

Funding

Kidney Research UK RP_030_20180306Medical Research Council MR/W03168X/1NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre NF-SI-0514-10091Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 204826/z/16/z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewKidney stone disease (KSD) is a common and potentially life-threatening condition, and half of patients experience a repeat kidney stone episode within 5-10 years. Despite the ~50% estimate heritability of KSD, international guidelines have not kept up with the pace of discovery of genetic causes of KSD. The European Association of Urology guidelines lists 7 genetic causes of KSD as 'high risk'. RECENT

findingsThere are currently 46 known monogenic (single gene) causes of kidney stone disease, with evidence of association in a further 23 genes. There is also evidence for polygenic risk of developing KSD. Evidence is lacking for recurrent disease, and only one genome wide association study has investigated this phenomenon, identifying two associated genes (SLC34A1 and TRPV5). However, in the absence of other evidence, patients with genetic predisposition to KSD should be treated as 'high risk'. Further studies are needed to characterize both monogenic and polygenic associations with recurrent disease, to allow for appropriate risk stratification. Durability of test result must be balanced against cost. This would enable retrospective analysis if no genetic cause was found initially. We recommend genetic testing using a gene panel for all children, adults < 25 years, and older patients who have factors associated with high risk disease within the context of a wider metabolic evaluation. Those with a genetic predisposition should be managed via a multi-disciplinary team approach including urologists, radiologists, nephrologists, clinical geneticists and chemical pathologists. This will enable appropriate follow-up, counselling and potentially prophylaxis.

Indexed as

Genetic TestingKidney CalculiGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansCalculiGeneticsGenomicsKidney stone diseaseNephrolithiasisNext generation sequencingUrolithiasis

Identifiers

PMID39096463
PMCPMC11374836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.