ReviewCurrent urology reports2024
Role of Genetic Testing in Kidney Stone Disease: A Narrative Review.
Review in Current urology reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Role and relevance of genetic testing in patients with kidney stones: a review from EAU Section of Endourology.Current opinion in urology · 2026Review
- Increased awareness around an ultra-rare disease can improve diagnosis delays: the French example in primary hyperoxalurias.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2026Article
- Prioritising genetic testing for kidney stone disease in adults using a clinical scoring system.Clinical kidney journal · 2026Article
- Urolithiasis in Children-Clinical Picture, Pathogenesis, and Diagnostic Approach.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- The Application of Nanomaterials in Kidney Stone Disease: Emerging Strategies for Early Diagnosis, Targeted Therapy, and Prevention.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- The effects of antibiotics use during early life and genetic risk on urolithiasis incidence: a large-scale UK biobank cohort study.World journal of urology · 2025Article
- [Reduced intestinal abundance ofNan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2025Article
- Variants of unknown significance are common in brushite stone formers undergoing genetic testing for nephrolithiasis.Urolithiasis · 2025Article
- Genetic susceptibility to kidney stone disease: unveiling pathogenesis and potential therapeutic targets.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2025Article
- Article
- Genetics of kidney stones and the role of genetic testing in prevention: a guide for urologists.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Whole exome sequencing reveals heparan sulfate proteoglycan 2 (HSPG2) as a potential causative gene for kidney stone disease in a Thai family.Urolithiasis · 2024Article
- [Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical UniversityArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewKidney stone disease (KSD) is a common and potentially life-threatening condition, and half of patients experience a repeat kidney stone episode within 5-10 years. Despite the ~50% estimate heritability of KSD, international guidelines have not kept up with the pace of discovery of genetic causes of KSD. The European Association of Urology guidelines lists 7 genetic causes of KSD as 'high risk'. RECENT
findingsThere are currently 46 known monogenic (single gene) causes of kidney stone disease, with evidence of association in a further 23 genes. There is also evidence for polygenic risk of developing KSD. Evidence is lacking for recurrent disease, and only one genome wide association study has investigated this phenomenon, identifying two associated genes (SLC34A1 and TRPV5). However, in the absence of other evidence, patients with genetic predisposition to KSD should be treated as 'high risk'. Further studies are needed to characterize both monogenic and polygenic associations with recurrent disease, to allow for appropriate risk stratification. Durability of test result must be balanced against cost. This would enable retrospective analysis if no genetic cause was found initially. We recommend genetic testing using a gene panel for all children, adults < 25 years, and older patients who have factors associated with high risk disease within the context of a wider metabolic evaluation. Those with a genetic predisposition should be managed via a multi-disciplinary team approach including urologists, radiologists, nephrologists, clinical geneticists and chemical pathologists. This will enable appropriate follow-up, counselling and potentially prophylaxis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.