ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2024
Development of a non-invasive diagnostic model for high-risk esophageal varices based on radiomics of spleen CT.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in Precise Assessment of Portal Pressure in Porto-sinusoidal Vascular Disease.Journal of clinical and translational hepatology · 2026Review
- Comprehensive approach to esophageal variceal bleeding: From prevention to treatment.World journal of gastroenterology · 2024Article
- Challenges and Future Perspectives for Artificial Intelligence in Hepatology: Breaking Barriers for Better Care.Journal of clinical and experimental hepatologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the diagnostic performance of radiomics models derived from multi-phase spleen CT for high-risk esophageal varices (HREV) in cirrhotic patients.
methodsWe retrospectively selected cirrhotic patients with esophageal varices from two hospitals from September 2019 to September 2023. Patients underwent non-contrast and contrast-enhanced CT scans and were categorized into HREV and non-HREV groups based on endoscopic evaluations. Radiomics features were extracted from spleen CT images in non-contrast, arterial, and portal venous phases, with feature selection via lasso regression and Pearson's correlation. Ten machine learning models were developed to diagnose HREV, evaluated by area under the curve (AUC). The AUC values of the three groups of models were statistically compared by the Kruskal-Wallis H test and Bonferroni-corrected Mann-Whitney U test. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
resultsAmong 233 patients, 11, 6, and 11 features were selected from non-contrast, arterial, and portal venous phases, respectively. Significant differences in AUC values were observed across phases (p < 0.05), and the arterial phase models showed the highest AUC values. The best model in arterial phase was the logical regression model, whose AUC value was 0.85, sensitivity was 83.3%, specificity was 80% and F1 score was 0.81.
conclusionRadiomics models based on spleen CT, especially the arterial phase models, demonstrate high diagnostic accuracy for HREV, offering the potential for early detection and intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39096392What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.