ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2024
Impact of routine bedside lung ultrasound implementation on chest x-ray requests for mechanically ventilated children: a before-after uncontrolled quality improvement project.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Extended vs. concise lung ultrasound scores to predict the need for respiratory support in bronchiolitis: a prospective observational study.European journal of pediatrics · 2025Observational
- Prognostic Role of Lung-Ultrasound Score in Acute Bronchiolitis Patients Treated With High Flow Nasal Cannula: A Prospective Study.Pediatric pulmonology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lung imaging techniques are crucial for managing ventilated patients in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs). Bedside chest x-ray has limitations such as low sensitivity and radiation exposure risks. Recently, lung ultrasound has emerged as a promising technology offering advantages such as real-time monitoring and radiation-free imaging. However, the integration of lung ultrasound into clinical practice raises questions about its impact on chest x-ray prescriptions. This study aims to assess whether implementing lung ultrasound reduces reliance on chest x-rays for ventilated pediatric patients in the PICU. This before-and-after uncontrolled quality improvement project was conducted from January 2022 to December 2023 in a referral PICU. The study included three phases: retrospective evaluation, learning phase, and prospective evaluation. Patients aged under 14 years, intubated, and ventilated for ≤ 30 days were included. Lung ultrasound was performed using a standardized protocol, and chest x-rays were conducted as per clinical indications. During the study period, 430 patients were admitted to the PICU, with 142 requiring mechanical ventilation. Implementation of routine bedside lung ultrasound led to a 39% reduction in chest x-ray requests (p < 0.001). Additionally, there was a significant decrease in irradiation exposure and a 27% reduction in costs associated with chest x-rays.Conclusion: Routine bedside lung ultrasound is a valuable tool in the modern PICU, it reduces the number of chest x-rays, with reduced radiation exposure and a potential cost savings. What is known: • Bedside chest x-ray is the main imaging study in ventilated pediatric patients • Chest x-ray is a valuable tool in pediatric critical care but it is associated with irradiation exposure What is new: • Implementation of bedside lung ultrasound in pediatric critical care unites reduces the chest x-rays requests and therefore patient-irradiation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39096386What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.