Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39096384›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2024

Procedural sedation and analgesia in Swiss Pediatric Emergency Departments: a national subgroup analysis of a European cross-sectional survey.

Fabrizio Romano, Gabriel Brändle, Olivia Abplanalp-Marti, Renato Gualtieri, Cyril Sahyoun

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fabrizio RomanoPediatric Emergency Department, Inselspital, University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2918-554X
Gabriel BrändleDivision of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Children's Hospital of Geneva, Geneva University Hospitals, Rue Willy Donzé, 6, 1205, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-1569-6250
Olivia Abplanalp-MartiPediatric Emergency Department, Inselspital, University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-1623-7382
Renato GualtieriDivision of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Children's Hospital of Geneva, Geneva University Hospitals, Rue Willy Donzé, 6, 1205, Geneva, Switzerland. renato.gualtieri@unige.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8164-7284
Cyril SahyounDivision of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Children's Hospital of Geneva, Geneva University Hospitals, Rue Willy Donzé, 6, 1205, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1475-0289

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to provide a national overview of procedural sedation and analgesia practices within Pediatric Emergency Departments in Switzerland, focusing on the availability of pharmacologic agents, the presence of safety protocols, the utilization of non-pharmacological interventions, and to identify specific local limitations. We conducted a detailed subgroup analysis of Swiss data from a European cross-sectional survey on emergency department pediatric Procedural Sedation and Analgesia (PSA) practice, isolating data from Swiss sites. The survey, conducted between November 2019 and March 2020, covered various aspects of procedural sedation and analgesia practices. The survey included nine Swiss sites, treating a total of 252,786 patients in 2019. Topical analgesia, inhaled equimolar nitrous oxide-oxygen mixture, and ketamine were largely available. All sites had nurse-directed triage protocols in place; however, opioid administration was included in the protocols in only 66% of sites. Only 33% of hospitals reported common use of intravenous sedation. Barriers to procedural sedation and analgesia implementation included staffing shortages (89% of sites) and lack of dedicated spaces (78%).Conclusions: Despite a broad array of pharmacological and options available in Swiss Pediatric Emergency Departments, challenges remain in standardizing practices across the country. Limited space and staffing and enhancing training on non-pharmacological interventions were identified as potential areas for improving pain and anxiety management in pediatric emergency care. This study underscores the need for national guidelines to harmonize emergency department PSA practices across Switzerland, ensuring all children have access to effective and evidence-based procedural comfort. What is Known: • Recent research, conducted in European emergency departments, suggests that in pediatric Procedural Sedation and Analgesia (PSA) resources are limited, and practice is heterogeneous What is New: • Swiss pediatric hospitals offer a wide range of pharmacological options for pain and anxiety management. However, significant barriers to PSA were identified. These include external control of intravenous sedation and insufficient integration of non-pharmacological interventions, such as child life specialists and procedural hypnosis. National guidelines are needed to harmonize PSA practices.

Indexed as

AnalgesiaEmergency Service, HospitalPain ManagementProcedural SedationChildCross-Sectional StudiesHealth Care SurveysHumansHypnotics and SedativesPractice Patterns, Physicians'SwitzerlandHypnotics and SedativesAnalgesiaPainPediatric Emergency MedicineProcedural sedationSwitzerland

Identifiers

PMID39096384
PMCPMC11413034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.