ArticleGeneral thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2025
Analysis of postoperative weight loss associated with prognosis after sublobar resections for lung cancer.
Article in General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesSublobar resections for lung cancer are increasing worldwide. However, the prognostic significance of weight loss after sublobar resection remains unclear. We aimed to investigate the prognostic significance of weight loss after sublobar resection for lung cancer.
methodsPatients who underwent sublobar resection for non-small cell lung cancer between January 2016 and June 2021 were analysed. The percentage weight change at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively was determined based on the preoperative weight. Patients were divided into two groups: those with or without weight loss ≥ 5%, referring to the diagnostic criteria for frailty, to assess prognosis. Subsequently, the prognosis-related timing of weight loss ≥ 5% and its risk factors were analyzed.
resultsWe reviewed 147 patients; 39 (26.5%) showed weight loss ≥ 5% within 1-year post-surgery. A total of 32 patients (21.8%) died, 13 from primary lung cancer and 19 from non-lung cancer causes. Cancer recurrence occurred in 22 patients (15.0%). Weight loss ≥ 5% within 1-year post-surgery was a poor prognostic factor for overall and recurrence-free survival (log-rank; p = 0.014 and 0.018, respectively). Additionally, weight loss ≥ 5% at 6-12 months postoperatively was associated with poor overall and recurrence-free survival (p < 0.05, both). In the multivariable analysis, an age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index ≥ 4 was a predictive factor for weight loss ≥ 5% at 6-12 months postoperatively (odds ratio, 3.920; p = 0.023).
conclusionsWeight loss ≥ 5% at 6-12 months postoperatively was associated with poor prognosis. Long-term nutritional management is important in the treatment plan of sublobar resection in high-risk patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39096344What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.