Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39096340›Full record

ArticlePsychological research2024

Action inhibition in a sport-specific paradigm: examining the limits of action control in basketball.

Carolin Wickemeyer, Iris Güldenpenning, Matthias Weigelt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Carolin WickemeyerDepartment of Sport & Health, Paderborn University, Warburger Straße 100, 33098, Paderborn, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany. carolin.wickemeyer@uni-paderborn.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5815-426X
Iris GüldenpenningDepartment of Sport & Health, Paderborn University, Warburger Straße 100, 33098, Paderborn, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0549-5543
Matthias WeigeltDepartment of Sport & Health, Paderborn University, Warburger Straße 100, 33098, Paderborn, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0348-9097

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To investigate the point where inappropriate defensive movements can no longer be inhibited and to validate suitable stimulus material for constructing a basketball-specific anticipation-response-inhibition task, two experiments were conducted. In Experiment 1, participants without basketball expertise (N = 25) watched a video of a basketball jump shot and were asked to release the space bar at the point when the ball leaves the player's fingertips (go-trials). In 25% of all trials, the video was stopped prematurely and participants should withhold their finger-lift response (stop-trials). A staircase-tracking algorithm was used to adjust the point-in-time when the jump shot was stopped in a way that participants' inhibition rate was at 50% (reflecting the so called "point-of-no-return", PNR). In Experiment 2, the stimulus material was adapted so that stop-trials simulated a pump fake. The PNR in Experiment 1 was located 187 ms and in Experiment 2 177 ms before the point of ball release. Precision performance benefit from practice across blocks and participants delayed their responses after stop-trials in a subsequent go-trial, which reflects strategic post-stop-trial adjustments. Based on the comparable results of previous studies, the given stimulus material is suitable for investigating response inhibition skills in dynamic sport-specific environments.

Indexed as

Athletic PerformanceBasketballInhibition, PsychologicalPsychomotor PerformanceAdultFemaleHumansMaleReaction TimeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39096340
PMCPMC11450028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.