Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39096337›Full record

ArticleClinical oral investigations2024

Remineralization of post-orthodontic white spot lesions with a fluoride varnish and a self-assembling P 11 - 4 peptides: a prospective in-vivo-study.

Ecem Güven, Ece Eden, Rengin Attin, Ezgi Cansu Fırıncıoğulları

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07664046 (A Three-arm Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Effectiveness of Self- Assembling Peptide P11-4 in the Remineralization of Enamel Carious White Spot Lesions), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07664046 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

A Three-arm Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Effectiveness of Self- Assembling Peptide P11-4 in the Remineralization of Enamel Carious White Spot Lesions

TypeinterventionalSponsorMedical University of WarsawRan2026 to 2027Enrolled75ConditionsWhite Spot Lesions on Smooth Surface of ToothArmsSelf-assembling peptide P11-4, Fluoride varnish
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ecem GüvenPrivate Practice, Izmir, Turkey.ORCID 0009-0001-3822-0901
Ece EdenDepartment of Pedodontics Faculty of Dentistry, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-8427-0427
Rengin AttinClinic for Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, Center for Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-2417-7356
Ezgi Cansu FırıncıoğullarıPrivate Practice, Izmir, Turkey. ezgicansu.erul@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-0355-2842

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective was to evaluate the remineralization effects of fluoride varnish (Clinpro White varnish), self-assembling peptide (Curodont™ Repair) and their combined use on WSL after orthodontic treatment. MATERIALS AND

methodsThirty-two subjects, aged of 10-18 (mean age 13.91 ± 2.92) with 107 post-orthodontic WSL were included in the study. Subjects were divided into four groups as control, tricalcium phosphate (TCP) containing fluoride varnish (Clinpro White varnish) group, self-assembling P11-4 peptides (Curodont™ Repair) group and combined application of the two products. At the beginning, each subjects' caries risk profile was assessed by evaluating diet cariogenicity, plaque index, gingival bleeding index and stimulated salivary flow rate. Before the application of the remineralization agents, WSL baseline demineralization values were determined with QLF Inspektor™ Pro, laser fluorescence using DIAGNOdent and color values were measured by Vita EasyShade. Remineralization data were obtained by measuring ΔF, ΔQ, and lesion area with QLF. The aesthetic improvement after the remineralization process was evaluated with a spectrophotometer at six weeks, three and six months.

resultsNo statistically significant differences were found between the groups in terms of criteria determining patients' caries risk profiles, DIAGNOdent data, and plaque index scores (p > 0.05). Intra-group evaluation following remineralization revealed statistically significant increases in ΔF and ΔQ with a decrease in lesion area for the fluoride varnish group at six months, for the peptide group at three months, and for the combined application group at three and six months (p < 0.05). In inter-group comparisons, ΔF and ΔQ values were found to be statistically significant only in the fluoride group at six months compared to the other groups (p < 0.05). While the L* value decreased significantly in all groups at six months, a statistically significant difference in ΔE* values was observed only in the control group between three and six months.

conclusionFluoride varnish with TCP showed highest remineralization at 6 months, and the remineralization was positively affected in the short term (three months) after the use of self-assembling P11-4 peptides and their combined application. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Remineralization obtained after single application of agents tested in six months in-vivo showed parallel results. In an attempt to trigger subsurface remineralization, the combined use of fluoride with self-assembling peptides as biomimetic remineralization agent needs further evaluation.

Indexed as

Fluorides, TopicalTooth RemineralizationAdolescentCariostatic AgentsChildDental CariesFemaleHumansMaleOligopeptidesPeptidesProspective StudiesCariostatic AgentsFluorides, TopicalOligopeptidesP11-4 peptidePeptidesP 11 − 4 peptideQLFQuantitative light induced fluorescenceRemineralizationTCPTricalcium phosphate

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.