Assessing muscle quality as a key predictor to differentiate fallers from non-fallers in older adults.

backgroundFalling is an important public health issue because of its prevalence and severe consequences. Evaluating muscle performance is important when assessing fall risk. The study aimed to identify factors [namely muscle capacity (strength, quality, and power) and spatio-temporal gait attributes] that best discriminate between fallers and non-fallers in older adults. The hypothesis is that muscle quality, defined as the ratio of muscle strength to muscle mass, is the best predictor of fall risk.

methods184 patients were included, 81% (n = 150) were women and the mean age was 73.6 ± 6.83 years. We compared body composition, mean grip strength, spatio-temporal parameters, and muscle capacity of fallers and non-fallers. Muscle quality was calculated as the ratio of maximum strength to fat-free mass. Mean handgrip and power were also controlled by fat-free mass. We performed univariate analysis, logistic regression, and ROC curves.

resultsThe falling patients had lower muscle quality, muscle mass-controlled power, and mean weighted handgrip than the non-faller. Results showing that lower muscle quality increases fall risk (effect size = 0.891). Logistic regression confirmed muscle quality as a significant predictor (p < .001, OR = 0.82, CI [0.74; 0.89]). ROC curves demonstrated muscle quality as the most predictive factor of falling (AUC = 0.794).

conclusionThis retrospective study showed that muscle quality is the best predictor of fall risk, above spatial and temporal gait parameters. Our results underscore muscle quality as a clinically meaningful assessment and may be a useful complement to other assessments for fall prevention in the aging population.