Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39096275›Full record

SynthesisJournal of occupational health2024

Interventions in the workplace to reduce risk factors for noncommunicable diseases: an umbrella review of systematic reviews of effectiveness.

Heidi Turon, Aaron Bezzina, Hannah Lamont, Courtney Barnes, Melanie Lum, Rebecca K Hodder, Gloria K W Leung, Anna Peeters, Luke Wolfenden, Serene Yoong

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of occupational health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. The social relevance of occupational medical examinations in Brazil.Revista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMT
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Heidi TuronSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6386-3394
Aaron BezzinaCentre for Resources Health and Safety, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan 2308, NSW, Australia.
Hannah LamontHunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, NSW, Australia.
Courtney BarnesSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.
Melanie LumInstitute for Health Transformation, Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Rebecca K HodderSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.
Gloria K W LeungInstitute for Health Transformation, Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Anna PeetersInstitute for Health Transformation, Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Luke WolfendenSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.
Serene YoongNational Centre of Implementation Science, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.

Funding

an NHMRC Early Career Fellowship APP1160419Heart Foundation Future Leader FellowshipNational Health and Medical Research Council APP1153479NHMRC Investigator Grant G1901360NSW Ministry of Health PRSP Research Fellowship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWorkplaces are an important setting to deliver programs to reduce risk factors for noncommunicable diseases (NCDs). To help decision makers understand the most current and relevant evidence regarding effectiveness of workplace programs, we conducted an umbrella review to present a comprehensive synthesis of the large volume of literature.

methodsSystematic reviews of workplace interventions targeting primary risk factors for NCDs-unhealthy diet, insufficient physical activity, overweight/obesity, tobacco use, and/or excessive alcohol use-published since 2010 were sourced. For each risk factor, reviews were categorized by intervention type and quality. The most recent, high-quality review was included for each intervention type. Evidence for the effectiveness of each intervention type was then broadly classified based on the review summary findings.

resultsTwenty-one reviews were included. Most reviews focused on diet (n = 5), physical activity (n = 7), or obesity (n = 9) interventions, with fewer targeting alcohol (n = 2) or tobacco (n = 2) use. Reviews of interventions focusing on individual behavior (such as education or counseling) were most common. Across diet, obesity, physical activity, and tobacco use, multicomponent interventions were consistently likely to be classified as "likely effective." Motivational interviewing and broad health promotion interventions were identified as "promising" for alcohol use.

conclusionThis umbrella review identified that multicomponent workplace interventions were effective to reduce NCD risk factors. There is a gap around interventions targeting alcohol use as most syntheses lacked enough studies to draw conclusions about effectiveness. Exploring the impact of interventions that utilize policy and/or environmental strategies is a critical gap for future research.

Indexed as

Health PromotionNoncommunicable DiseasesSystematic Reviews as TopicWorkplaceAlcohol DrinkingDietExerciseHumansObesityOccupational HealthRisk FactorsTobacco Useinterventionsnoncommunicable diseasereviewrisk factorsumbrella reviewworkplace

Identifiers

PMID39096275
PMCPMC11784587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.