Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39096172›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society2024

Hyperacute ischemic stroke care-Current treatment and future directions.

Bruce Cv Campbell

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Should we switch to tenecteplase for all ischemic strokes? Evidence and logistics.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Bruce Cv CampbellDepartment of Medicine and Neurology, Melbourne Brain Centre at the Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A decade on from the first positive thrombectomy trials, hyperacute therapies for ischemic stroke continue to rapidly advance. Effective treatments remain limited to reperfusion, although several cytoprotective approaches continue to be investigated. Intravenous fibrinolytics are now demonstrated to be beneficial up to 24 h in patients selected using perfusion imaging, but their role in patients with non-disabling symptoms appears very limited. Tenecteplase is superior to alteplase in meta-analysis of the latest trials, and adjuvant thrombolytics are an area of active investigation. Endovascular thrombectomy is beneficial in a wide range of anterior and posterior circulation large vessel occlusions up to 24 h after onset with the more distal occlusions, mild presentations, and >24 h window being the main frontiers to be tested in ongoing trials. Imaging parameters are prognostic but appear not to modify the relative treatment benefit of thrombectomy versus standard medical care. Therefore, deciding who not to treat with thrombectomy is a key clinical challenge that requires careful but rapid integration of clinical, imaging, and patient preference considerations. Systems of care to accelerate delivery of these highly effective therapies will maximize benefits for the greatest number of patients with stroke.

Indexed as

Fibrinolytic AgentsIschemic StrokeThrombectomyEndovascular ProceduresHumansThrombolytic TherapyFibrinolytic Agentsbasilar artery occlusionendovascular thrombectomymild strokePre-hospital triagereperfusionthrombolytic

Identifiers

PMID39096172
PMCPMC11298121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.