Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39095991›Full record

ReviewMolecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy2024

T cell-redirecting therapies in hematological malignancies: Current developments and novel strategies for improved targeting.

Georgina S F Anderson, Michael A Chapman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. A Drug-Gated, Modular STAb-T Immunotherapy With External Control.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Staying on target in gene and cell therapy.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Georgina S F AndersonMRC Toxicology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1QR, UK.
Michael A ChapmanMRC Toxicology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1QR, UK; Department of Haematology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0XY, UK; Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Universities Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK. Electronic address: mac54@cam.ac.uk.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00025/10
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

T cell-redirecting therapies (TCRTs), such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) or T cell receptor (TCR) T cells and T cell engagers, have emerged as a highly effective treatment modality, particularly in the B and plasma cell-malignancy setting. However, many patients fail to achieve deep and durable responses; while the lack of truly unique tumor antigens, and concurrent on-target/off-tumor toxicities, have hindered the development of TCRTs for many other cancers. In this review, we discuss the recent developments in TCRT targets for hematological malignancies, as well as novel targeting strategies that aim to address these, and other, challenges.

Indexed as

Hematologic NeoplasmsImmunotherapy, AdoptiveReceptors, Antigen, T-CellReceptors, Chimeric AntigenT-LymphocytesAnimalsAntigens, NeoplasmHumansAntigens, NeoplasmReceptors, Antigen, T-CellReceptors, Chimeric AntigenCAR T cellhematological malignanciesimmunotherapyon-target, off-tumor toxicitiesT cell engagerT cell-redirecting therapies

Identifiers

PMID39095991
PMCPMC11403239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.