Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39095978›Full record

ArticleJournal of minimal access surgery2025

Impact of uterine weight on surgical outcomes in robotic hysterectomy: An ambispective analysis.

Anupama Bahadur, Shloka Sharma, Ayush Heda, Latika Chawla, Rajlaxmi Mundhra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of minimal access surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anupama BahadurDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.
Shloka Sharma
Ayush Heda
Latika Chawla
Rajlaxmi Mundhra

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRobot-assisted surgeries are increasingly used for the treatment of benign gynaecological conditions. However, their impact in cases of significantly enlarged uteruses remains uncertain. This study aims to investigate whether the weight of the uterus influences the surgical results of robotic hysterectomy. PATIENTS AND

methodsAmbispective analysis of 306 cases was performed, of which 265 cases were analysed retrospectively. The outcome measures included total operative time, including docking time, console time and vault closure time, complication rates and quality of life (World Health Organization Quality of Life Brief questionnaire) stratified based on uterine sizes into three groups by every 250 g.

resultsOf the 306 cases, 76.47% of cases ( n = 234) had uterine weight <250 g, 18.30% of cases ( n = 56) had uterine weight between 250 and 500 g, while 5.23% of cases ( n = 16) had a weight of uterine specimen >500 g. The total operative time was significantly lower in the <250 g group compared to >500 g (81.92 ± 22.81 vs. 111.88 ± 40.27 min; P = 0.003), contributed primarily by the console time. Although the need for post-operative blood transfusion was higher in the >500 g group, the overall complication rate between the three groups was similar. The three groups had comparable QOL through all four domains.

conclusionThe present study underscores the influence of uterine weight on robotic hysterectomy outcomes, revealing increased operative times and post-operative haemoglobin drop for uteri over 500 g. Despite these challenges, complications were not significantly affected by uterine size.

Indexed as

Hysterectomyoperative timequality of liferobotic surgeryuterine weight

Identifiers

PMID39095978
PMCPMC12327795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.