Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39095923›Full record

ArticleTrials2024

The ReInvigorate Study-phrenic nerve-to-diaphragm stimulation for weaning from mechanical ventilation: a protocol for a randomized pivotal clinical trial.

Katie Schaaf, Christopher M Mullin, Kyle W Cunningham, Jonathan Eaton, Steven A Conrad

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05998018 (Randomized Study of the pdSTIM™ System), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05998018 naterminatednot on this map

Randomized Study of the pdSTIM™ System (Phrenic Nerve to Diaphragm STIMulation) in Failure to Wean Mechanically Ventilated Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorStimdia Medical Inc.Ran2023 to 2025Enrolled60ConditionsNeuromodulation, Phrenic Nerve Stimulation, Ventilator Induced Diaphragm Dysfunction, Mechanical Ventilation WeaningArmspdSTIM System Therapy, Conventional Medical Management
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Katie SchaafStimdia Medical, Inc, 1355 Mendota Heights Road, Suite 300, Mendota Heights, MN, 55120, USA.
Christopher M MullinNAMSA, 6750 Wales Rd, Northwood, OH, 43619, USA.
Kyle W CunninghamAtrium Health, 1000 Blythe Blvd, Charlotte, NC, 28203, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6526-183X
Jonathan EatonLouisiana State University Health Sciences Center, 1501 Kings Highway, Shreveport, LA, 71103, USA.
Steven A ConradLouisiana State University Health Sciences Center, 1501 Kings Highway, Shreveport, LA, 71103, USA. steven.conrad@lsuhs.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4014-969X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the United States in 2017, there were an estimated 903,745 hospitalizations involving mechanical ventilation (MV). Complications from ventilation can result in longer hospital stays, increased risk of disability, and increased healthcare costs. It has been hypothesized that electrically pacing the diaphragm by phrenic nerve stimulation during mechanical ventilation may minimize or reverse diaphragm dysfunction, resulting in faster weaning.

methodsThe ReInvigorate Trial is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of Stimdia's pdSTIM System for facilitating weaning from MV. The pdSTIM system employs percutaneously placed multipolar electrodes to stimulate the cervical phrenic nerves and activate contraction of the diaphragm bilaterally. Patients who were on mechanical ventilation for at least 96 h and who failed at least one weaning attempt were considered for enrollment in the study. The primary efficacy endpoint was the time to successful liberation from mechanical ventilation (treatment vs. control). Secondary endpoints will include the rapid shallow breathing index and other physiological and system characteristics. Safety will be summarized for both primary and additional analyses. All endpoints will be evaluated at 30 days or at the time of removal of mechanical ventilation, whichever is first. DISCUSSION: This pivotal study is being conducted under an investigational device exception with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. The technology being studied could provide a first-of-kind therapy for difficult-to-wean patients on mechanical ventilation in an intensive care unit setting.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov, NCT05998018 , registered August 2023.

Indexed as

DiaphragmMulticenter Studies as TopicPhrenic NerveRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicVentilator WeaningElectric Stimulation TherapyHumansProspective StudiesRespiration, ArtificialTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeDiaphragm stimulationMechanical ventilationPhrenic nerveVentilator-induced diaphragm dysfunctionWeaning

Identifiers

PMID39095923
PMCPMC11295437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.