ArticleBMC research notes2024
The 26 S proteasome in Entamoeba histolytica: divergence of the substrate binding pockets from host proteasomes.
Article in BMC research notes, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveProteasomes are conserved proteases crucial for proteostasis in eukaryotes and are promising drug targets for protozoan parasites. Yet, the proteasomes of Entamoeba histolytica remain understudied. The study's objective was to analyse the differences in the substrate binding pockets of amoeba proteasomes from those of host, and computational modelling of β5 catalytic subunit, with the goal of finding selective inhibitors.
resultsComparative sequence analysis revealed differences in substrate binding sites of E. histolytica proteasomes, especially in the S1 and S3 pockets of the catalytic beta subunits, implying differences in substrate preference and susceptibility to inhibitors from host proteasomes. This was strongly supported by significantly lower sensitivity to MG132 mediated inhibition of amoebic proteasome β5 subunit's chymotryptic activity compared to human proteasomes, also reflected in lower sensitivity of E. histolytica to MG132 for inhibition of proliferation. Computational models of β4 and β5 subunits, and a docked β4-β5 model revealed a binding pocket between β4-β5, similar to that of Leishmania tarentolae. Selective inhibitors for visceral leishmaniasis, LXE408 and compound 8, docked well to this pocket. This functional and sequence-based analysis predicts differences between amoebic and host proteasomes that can be utilized to develop rationally designed, selective inhibitors against E. histolytica.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.