ArticleBiology direct2024
Evolution of retrocopies in the context of HUSH silencing.
Article in Biology direct, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Retrotransposition is one of the main factors responsible for gene duplication and thus genome evolution. However, the sequences that undergo this process are not only an excellent source of biological diversity, but in certain cases also pose a threat to the integrity of the DNA. One of the mechanisms that protects against the incorporation of mobile elements is the HUSH complex, which is responsible for silencing long, intronless, transcriptionally active transposed sequences that are rich in adenine on the sense strand. In this study, broad sets of human and porcine retrocopies were analysed with respect to the above factors, taking into account evolution of these molecules. Analysis of expression pattern, genomic structure, transcript length, and nucleotide substitution frequency showed the strong relationship between the expression level and exon length as well as the protective nature of introns. The results of the studies also showed that there is no direct correlation between the expression level and adenine content. However, protein-coding retrocopies, which have a lower adenine content, have a significantly higher expression level than the adenine-rich non-coding but expressed retrocopies. Therefore, although the mechanism of HUSH silencing may be an important part of the regulation of retrocopy expression, it is one component of a more complex molecular network that remains to be elucidated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.