Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39095899›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of medical research2024

Biomedical literature mining: graph kernel-based learning for gene-gene interaction extraction.

Ai-Ru Hsieh, Chen-Yu Tsai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of medical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ai-Ru HsiehDepartment of Statistics, Tamkang University, Tamsui District, New Taipei City, 251301, Taiwan. airudropbox@gmail.com.
Chen-Yu TsaiDepartment of Statistics, Tamkang University, Tamsui District, New Taipei City, 251301, Taiwan.

Funding

National Science and Technology Council in Taiwan 110-2314-B-032 -001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The supervised machine learning method is often used for biomedical relationship extraction. The disadvantage is that it requires much time and money to manually establish an annotated dataset. Based on distant supervision, the knowledge base is combined with the corpus, thus, the training corpus can be automatically annotated. As many biomedical databases provide knowledge bases for study with a limited number of annotated corpora, this method is practical in biomedicine. The clinical significance of each patient's genetic makeup can be understood based on the healthcare provider's genetic database. Unfortunately, the lack of previous biomedical relationship extraction studies focuses on gene-gene interaction. The main purpose of this study is to develop extraction methods for gene-gene interactions that can help explain the heritability of human complex diseases. This study referred to the information on gene-gene interactions in the KEGG PATHWAY database, the abstracts in PubMed were adopted to generate the training sample set, and the graph kernel method was adopted to extract gene-gene interactions. The best assessment result was an F1-score of 0.79. Our developed distant supervision method automatically finds sentences through the corpus without manual labeling for extracting gene-gene interactions, which can effectively reduce the time cost for manual annotation data; moreover, the relationship extraction method based on a graph kernel can be successfully applied to extract gene-gene interactions. In this way, the results of this study are expected to help achieve precision medicine.

Indexed as

Data MiningEpistasis, GeneticDatabases, GeneticHumansMachine LearningBiomedical text miningGene–gene interactionGraph kernel

Identifiers

PMID39095899
PMCPMC11297645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.