Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39095898›Full record

ArticleAddiction science & clinical practice2024

Exploring perceptions of genetic risk and the transmission of substance use disorders.

Amanda Keller, Emily A Bosk, Alicia Mendez, Brett Greenfield, Carolynn Flynn, Gina Everett DelJones, Fabrys Julien, MacKenzie Michael

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction science & clinical practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Amanda KellerMcGill University School of Social Work, 550 Sherbrooke Ouest Suite 100, Tour Est Montreal, Montreal, H3A 1B9, QC, Canada. amanda.keller@mail.mcgill.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-9605-5836
Emily A BoskRutgers University, 390 George St., Room 713, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Alicia MendezSchool of Social Work, Boston University, 264 Bay State Rd, 02215, Boston, MA, USA.
Brett GreenfieldSchool of Social Work, Rutgers University, 390 George St, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USA.
Carolynn FlynnThe Center for Great Expectations, Somerset, NJ, 08873, USA.
Gina Everett DelJonesThe Center for Great Expectations, Somerset, NJ, 08873, USA.
Fabrys JulienMcGill University School of Social Work, 550 Sherbrooke Ouest Suite 100, Tour Est Montreal, Montreal, H3A 1B9, QC, Canada.
MacKenzie MichaelResearch Chair in Child Well-Being, McGill University School of Social Work, 550 Sherbrooke Ouest Suite 100, Tour Est Montreal, Montreal, H3A 1B9, QC, Canada.

Funding

CSAT SAMHSA HHS #SMM063241VANIER CANADA GRADUATE SCHOLARSHIP 01353-000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSubstance use disorders (SUDs) have been consistently shown to exhibit moderate intergenerational continuity (1-3). While much research has examined genetic and social influences on addiction, less attention has been paid to clients' and lay persons' perceptions of genetic influences on the heritability of SUD (4) and implications for treatment.

methodsFor this qualitative study, twenty-six structured Working Model of the Child Interviews (WMCI) were conducted with mothers receiving inpatient SUD treatment. These interviews were thematically analyzed for themes related to maternal perceptions around intergenerational transmission of substance use behaviours.

resultsFindings show that over half of the mothers in this sample were preoccupied with their children's risk factors for addictions. Among this group, 29% spontaneously expressed concerns about their children's genetic risk for addiction, 54% shared worries about their children's propensity for addiction without mentioning the word gene or genetic. Additionally, 37% had challenges in even discussing their children's future when prompted. These concerns mapped onto internal working models of attachment in unexpected ways, with parents who were coded with balanced working models being more likely to discuss intergenerational risk factors and parents with disengaged working models displaying difficulties in discussing their child's future.

conclusionThis research suggests that the dominant discourse around the brain-disease model of addictions, in its effort to reduce stigma and self-blame, may have unintended downstream consequences for parents' mental models about their children's risks for future addiction. Parents receiving SUD treatment, and the staff who deliver it, may benefit from psychoeducation about the intergenerational transmission of SUD as part of treatment.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseMothersSubstance-Related DisordersAdultChildFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMother-Child RelationsQualitative ResearchRisk FactorsBrain Disease Model of AddictionChildren of substance usersContinuity of Substance Use Disorder; intergenerational transmission of Substance Use DisorderGenetic riskNew Genetics; Lay GeneticsSubstance Use DisorderSubstance Use Disorder TreatmentWorking Model of the child interview

Identifiers

PMID39095898
PMCPMC11295387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.