ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2024
The results of preventing postoperative achilles tendon adhesion using cross-linked and non-cross-linked hyaluronic acid, a study with rat model.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Challenge of Corneal Ulcer Healing: A Novel Conceptual Framework, the "Triad" of Corneal Ulcer Healing/Corneal Neovascularization/Intraocular Pressure, and Avascular Tendon Healing, for Evaluation of Corneal Ulcer Therapy, Therapy of Neovascularization, Glaucoma Therapy, and Pentadecapeptide BPC 157 Efficacy.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThere are many adhesion barrier materials, cross-linked or non-cross-linked hyaluronic acid (HA), used during surgeries. PURPOSE: This study investigates the efficacy of cross-linked and non-cross-linked HA in preventing Achilles tendon adhesions. We hypothesized that non-cross-linked HA may be more effective than cross-linked HA in preventing Achilles tendon adhesions following injury and repair.
methodsTwenty male Sprague Dawley rats, totaling 40 legs, underwent Achilles tendon transection and repair. Following the surgery, they were treated simultaneously with cross-linked and non-cross-linked HA formulations. The rats were divided into four groups: a positive control group, a group treated with BMC non-cross-linked HA gel, a group treated with DEFEHERE cross-linked HA gel, and a group treated with ANIKA cross-linked HA gel. Four weeks after surgery, macroscopic evaluation of peritendinous adhesion and histological analysis were conducted to assess the effectiveness of the treatments.
resultsNon-cross-linked BMC HA demonstrated superior efficacy in preventing tendon adhesions compared to cross-linked HA and control groups. Histological analysis confirmed reduced adhesion severity in the non-cross-linked HA group (P < 0.05). The findings support the potential of non-cross-linked HA as a treatment to inhibit tendon adhesions. Further research, including clinical trials, is warranted to validate these results in human subjects.
conclusionsNon-cross-linked BMC HA had significantly lower tendon adhesions parameters and better healing scores in histological analysis than cross-linked HA and control group did. Non-cross-linked HA holds promise as a potential treatment to inhibit the formation of such adhesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.