Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39095876›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2024

A prospective non-randomized feasibility study of an online membership-based fitness program for promoting physical activity in people with mobility impairments.

Laurie A Malone, Tapan Mehta, Christen J Mendonca, Sangeetha Mohanraj, Mohanraj Thirumalai

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT05138809 (Evaluation of the Lakeshore Online Fitness Program), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05138809 nacompletednot on this map

Evaluation of the Lakeshore Online Fitness Program

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamRan2021 to 2022Enrolled33ConditionsPhysically DisabledArmsExercise
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Laurie A MaloneDepartment of Occupational Therapy, School of Health Professions, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. lamalone@uab.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9426-6325
Tapan MehtaDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Christen J MendoncaSchool of Health Professions, UAB Research Collaborative, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Sangeetha MohanrajSchool of Health Professions, UAB Research Collaborative, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Mohanraj ThirumalaiDivision of Preventive Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.

Funding

ACL HHS 90REGE0002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople with mobility limitations have a disproportionately higher rate of acquiring secondary conditions such as obesity, cardiovascular comorbidity, pain, fatigue, depression, deconditioning, and type 2 diabetes. These conditions often result from poor access to home and community-based health promotion/wellness programs. The aim of this project was to determine the feasibility of delivering an online community membership-based fitness program for individuals with mobility impairments.

methodsFor this prospective single-arm study, participants were recruited from members of a community fitness facility that serves people with physical disabilities and chronic health conditions. While all members had access to the online platform, individuals had to opt-in to participate in the research component. Activity options included 16 pre-recorded videos and 9 live exercise classes. During the 8-week program, participants had an opportunity to earn three exercise incentives for reaching certain activity milestones. Enrollment percentage, attendance, and attrition were tracked to assess program feasibility and acceptability. Changes in participant-reported outcomes including self-reported physical activity, psychosocial outcomes, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) were examined using non-parametric analyses.

resultsA total of 146 eligible individuals were screened of which 33 enrolled (22.6%). Two participants withdrew from the study, so a total of 31 were used for analyses. Participants included 29 women and 12 Black people with an average age of 60 (± 15.9) years. Health conditions included stroke, post-polio, arthritis, neuropathy, cerebral palsy, and obesity. Ten participants used an assistive device to get around inside the home. Twenty-six participants (78.8%) completed the online program, and 5 participants earned all 3 participation incentives. The mean number of live Zoom exercise classes attended by the participants was 12.8 (range = 0-43) over 8 weeks; 3 of 31 participants did not attend any classes. On average, participants watched 128 min (range = 0-704 min) of pre-recorded videos; 6 of 31 participants did not view any pre-recorded videos. Self-reported physical activity showed the largest improvement (11.15 units; 95% CI, 3.08, 19.56) with an effect size of 0.51 (Cohen's d).

conclusionsThis pilot study of an online membership-based fitness program for people with mobility impairments demonstrated preliminary effectiveness in increasing physical activity and was found to be feasible and acceptable. Feasibility endpoints do indicate potential to improve retention. These results suggest that online delivery of exercise programs can broaden the reach of specialized community fitness programs and is a promising direction for future work and fully powered trials are warranted to assess intervention efficacy.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05138809. Registered September 2, 2021, ClinicalTrials.gov PRS: Record Summary NCT05138809.

Indexed as

Community programOnline fitnessPhysical activityPhysical disability

Identifiers

PMID39095876
PMCPMC11295342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.