Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39095859›Full record

SynthesisRadiation oncology (London, England)2024

Advances in breast cancer treatment: a systematic review of preoperative stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for breast cancer.

Mateusz Bilski, Katarzyna Konat-Bąska, Maria Alessia Zerella, Stefanie Corradini, Marcin Hetnał, Maria Cristina Leonardi, Martyna Gruba, Aleksandra Grzywacz, Patrycja Hatala, Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa and 2 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Early Radiation Therapy Response Assessment Using Multi-Scale Photoacoustic Imaging.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Mateusz BilskiDepartment of Radiotherapy, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Katarzyna Konat-BąskaDepartment of Brachytherapy, Lower Silesian Oncology Pulmonology and Hematology Center, Wrocław, Poland.
Maria Alessia ZerellaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141, Milan, Italy.
Stefanie CorradiniDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Marcin HetnałDepartment of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University, Kraków, Poland.
Maria Cristina LeonardiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141, Milan, Italy.
Martyna GrubaDepartment of Radiotherapy, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Aleksandra GrzywaczDepartment of Radiotherapy, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Patrycja HatalaDepartment of Radiotherapy, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Barbara Alicja Jereczek-FossaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141, Milan, Italy.
Jacek FijuthDepartment of Radiotherapy, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland.
Łukasz KuncmanDepartment of Radiotherapy, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland. lukasz.kuncman@umed.lodz.pl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast conserving treatment typically involves surgical excision of tumor and adjuvant radiotherapy targeting the breast area or tumor bed. Accurately defining the tumor bed is challenging and lead to irradiation of greater volume of healthy tissues. Preoperative stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) which target tumor may solves that issues. We conducted a systematic literature review to evaluates the early toxicity and cosmetic outcomes of this promising treatment approach. Secondary we reviewed pathological complete response (pCR) rates, late toxicity, patient selection criteria and radiotherapy protocols. We retrieved literature from PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, ScienceDirect, and ClinicalTrials.gov. The study adhered to the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Ten prospective clinical trials (7 phase II, 3 phase I), encompassing 188 patients (aged 18-75 years, cT1-T3 cN0-N3 cM0, primarily with ER/PgR-positive, HER2-negative status,), were analyzed. Median follow-up was 15 months (range 3-30). Treatment involved single-fraction SBRT (15-21Gy) in five studies and fractionated (19.5-31.5Gy in 3 fractions) in the rest. Time interval from SBRT to surgery was 9.5 weeks (range 1-28). Acute and late G2 toxicity occurred in 0-17% and 0-19% of patients, respectively, G3 toxicity was rarely observed. The cosmetic outcome was excellent in 85-100%, fair in 0-10% and poor in only 1 patient. pCR varied, showing higher rates (up to 42%) with longer intervals between SBRT and surgery and when combined with neoadjuvant systemic therapy (up to 90%). Preoperative SBRT significantly reduce overall treatment time, enabling to minimalize volumes. Early results indicate excellent cosmetic effects and low toxicity.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsRadiosurgeryFemaleHumansPreoperative CareBreast cancerBreast neoplasmBreast tumorNeoadjuvantPreoperativeSABRSBRTStereotactic ablative body radiotherapyStereotactic body radiation therapyTumor bed

Identifiers

PMID39095859
PMCPMC11295558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.