ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2024
Effectiveness of kneeling training in improving mobility and balance post-stroke.
Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Efficacy of Exercise Modalities for Motor Function Recovery After Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Recent research on rehabilitation interventions for post-stroke gait and balance in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Quadrupedal training approaches in post-stroke rehabilitation: a scoping review of evidence, mechanisms, and clinical applications.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFall prevention and balance control constitute critical components of rehabilitation for stroke survivors. Kneeling training, characterized by its low center of gravity focus, has been incorporated into rehabilitation regimens to enhance postural control across various pathological conditions. Despite its widespread use, empirical evidence substantiating the efficacy of kneeling training is limited, particularly in the context of mobility and balance improvement for patients who have had a stroke. This study aims to substantiate the safety and effectiveness of kneeling training in individuals recovering from stroke.
methodsA randomized controlled trial comparing kneeling training and conventional rehabilitation training was conducted, involving sixty-seven participants allocated to the Kneeling Training Group (KNT) and the Conventional Rehabilitation Group (CVR). The KNT group underwent 30-minute sessions of kneeling training, while the CVR group received conventional treadmill walking training, both administered six times per week over four weeks. Evaluation encompassed the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Lower Extremity (FMA-LE), the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), and gait analysis was conducted at baseline, as well as at the 2 and 4-week intervals.
resultsOur study established the safety of a 4-week kneeling training program. Notably, the KNT group exhibited more pronounced improvements in BBS scores at weeks 2 and 4 compared to the CVR group. However, no significant disparities emerged in FMA-LE and gait analysis between the two groups. Our findings suggest that kneeling training may serve as a viable option for enhancing lower limb balance in survivors who have had a stroke.
conclusionsWe conclude that kneeling training, characterized by its safety, simplicity, and no restrictions on location or equipment, represents a valuable therapeutic approach for enhancing walking balance in individuals recovering from stroke.
trial registrationClinical trials ChiCTR1900028385, December 20, 2019.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.