Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39095849›Full record

ArticleJournal of ovarian research2024

The molecular prognostic score, a classifier for risk stratification of high-grade serous ovarian cancer.

Siddik Sarkar, Sarbar Ali Saha, Abhishek Swarnakar, Arnab Chakrabarty, Avipsa Dey, Poulomi Sarkar, Sarthak Banerjee, Pralay Mitra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ovarian research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Siddik SarkarCancer Biology & Inflammatory Disorder, Translational Research Unit of Excellence (TRUE), CSIR-Indian Institute of Chemical Biology, Kolkata, WB, 700032, India. siddik.sarkar@iicb.res.in.
Sarbar Ali SahaCancer Biology & Inflammatory Disorder, Translational Research Unit of Excellence (TRUE), CSIR-Indian Institute of Chemical Biology, Kolkata, WB, 700032, India.
Abhishek SwarnakarCancer Biology & Inflammatory Disorder, Translational Research Unit of Excellence (TRUE), CSIR-Indian Institute of Chemical Biology, Kolkata, WB, 700032, India.
Arnab ChakrabartyCancer Biology & Inflammatory Disorder, Translational Research Unit of Excellence (TRUE), CSIR-Indian Institute of Chemical Biology, Kolkata, WB, 700032, India.
Avipsa DeyCancer Biology & Inflammatory Disorder, Translational Research Unit of Excellence (TRUE), CSIR-Indian Institute of Chemical Biology, Kolkata, WB, 700032, India.
Poulomi SarkarCancer Biology & Inflammatory Disorder, Translational Research Unit of Excellence (TRUE), CSIR-Indian Institute of Chemical Biology, Kolkata, WB, 700032, India.
Sarthak BanerjeeCancer Biology & Inflammatory Disorder, Translational Research Unit of Excellence (TRUE), CSIR-Indian Institute of Chemical Biology, Kolkata, WB, 700032, India.
Pralay MitraComputer Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur, WB, 721302, India.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe clinicopathological parameters such as residual tumor, grade, the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) score are often used to predict the survival of ovarian cancer patients, but the 5-year survival of high grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) still remains around 30%. Hence, the relentless pursuit of enhanced prognostic tools for HGSOC, this study introduces an unprecedented gene expression-based molecular prognostic score (mPS). Derived from a novel 20-gene signature through Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO)-Cox regression, the mPS stands out for its predictive prowess.

resultsValidation across diverse datasets, including training and test sets (n = 491 each) and a large HGSOC patient cohort from the Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis (OTTA) consortium (n = 7542), consistently shows an area-under-curve (AUC) around 0.7 for predicting 5-year overall survival. The mPS's impact on prognosis resonates profoundly, yielding an adjusted hazard-ratio (HR) of 6.1 (95% CI: 3.65-10.3; p < 0.001), overshadowing conventional parameters-FIGO score, residual disease, and age. Molecular insights gleaned from mPS stratification uncover intriguing pathways, with focal-adhesion, Wnt, and Notch signaling upregulated, and antigen processing and presentation downregulated (p < 0.001) in high-risk HGSOC cohorts.

conclusionPositioned as a robust prognostic marker, the 20-gene signature-derived mPS emerges as a potential game-changer in clinical settings. Beyond its role in predicting overall survival, its implications extend to guiding alternative therapies, especially targeting Wnt/Notch signaling pathways and immune evasion-a promising avenue for improving outcomes in high-risk HGSOC patients.

Indexed as

Ovarian NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorCystadenocarcinoma, SerousFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingPrognosisRisk AssessmentBiomarkers, TumorBiomarkerHigh grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC)Molecular prognostic score (mPS)Over-all survival (OS)Prognosis

Identifiers

PMID39095849
PMCPMC11296390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.