Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39095821›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2024

India Hypertension Control Initiative: decentralization of hypertension care to health wellness centres in Punjab and Maharashtra, India, 2018-2022.

Tejpalsinh A Chavan, Mogan Kaviprawin, Manikandanesan Sakthivel, Navneet Kishore, Padmaja Jogewar, Sandeep Singh Gill, Abhishek Kunwar, Kiran Durgad, Amol B Wankhede, Vishwajit Bharadwaj and 15 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Tejpalsinh A ChavanDivision of Noncommunicable Diseases (NCD), Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) - National Institute of Epidemiology (NIE), Chennai, India. eapindiafetp23@gmail.com.
Mogan KaviprawinDivision of Noncommunicable Diseases (NCD), Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) - National Institute of Epidemiology (NIE), Chennai, India.
Manikandanesan SakthivelDivision of Noncommunicable Diseases (NCD), Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) - National Institute of Epidemiology (NIE), Chennai, India.
Navneet KishoreDivision of Noncommunicable Diseases (NCD), Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) - National Institute of Epidemiology (NIE), Chennai, India.
Padmaja JogewarState NCD Cell, Directorate of Health Services, Government of Maharashtra, Mumbai, India.
Sandeep Singh GillState NCD Cell, Department of Health and Family Welfare, Government of Punjab, Chandigarh, India.
Abhishek KunwarDepartment of Noncommunicable Diseases, WHO Country Office, New Delhi, India.
Kiran DurgadDepartment of Noncommunicable Diseases, WHO Country Office, New Delhi, India.
Amol B WankhedeIHCI Project, State NCD Cell, WHO, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Vishwajit BharadwajIHCI Project, District NCD Cell, WHO, Bhandara, Maharashtra, India.
Suhas N KhedkarIHCI Project, District NCD Cell, WHO, Satara, Maharashtra, India.
Lalit SarodeIHCI Project, District NCD Cell, WHO, Wardha, Maharashtra, India.
Bidisha DasIHCI Project, District NCD Cell, WHO, Bhatinda, Punjab, India.
Sampada D BangarICMR-National AIDS Research Institute, Pune, India.
Vettrichelvan VenkatasamyDivision of Noncommunicable Diseases (NCD), Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) - National Institute of Epidemiology (NIE), Chennai, India.
Ashu GuptaState NCD Cell, Department of Health and Family Welfare, Government of Punjab, Chandigarh, India.
Mosoniro KriinaDivision of Noncommunicable Diseases (NCD), Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) - National Institute of Epidemiology (NIE), Chennai, India.
Ashish KrishnaResolve to Save Lives, New Delhi, India.
Anupam Khungar PathniResolve to Save Lives, New Delhi, India.
Swagata K SahooResolve to Save Lives, New Delhi, India.
Ganeshkumar ParasuramanDivision of Noncommunicable Diseases (NCD), Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) - National Institute of Epidemiology (NIE), Chennai, India.
Roopa ShivashankarICMR, New Delhi, India.
Pragati PragyaICMR, New Delhi, India.
Meenakshi SharmaICMR, New Delhi, India.
Prabhdeep KaurDivision of Noncommunicable Diseases (NCD), Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) - National Institute of Epidemiology (NIE), Chennai, India.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe India Hypertension Control Initiative (IHCI) emphasizes decentralized patient-centric care to boost hypertension control in public healthcare facilities. We documented the decentralization process, enrolment pattern by facility type, and treatment outcomes in nine districts of Punjab and Maharashtra states, India, from 2018-2022.

methodsWe detailed the shift in hypertension care from higher facilities to Health and Wellness Centres (HWCs) using the World Health Organization (WHO) health system pillar framework. We reviewed hypertension treatment records in 4,045 public facilities from nine districts in the two states, focusing on indicators including registration numbers, the proportion of controlled, uncontrolled blood pressure (BP), and missed visits among those under care.

resultsThe decentralization process involved training, treatment protocol provision, supervision, and monitoring. Among 394,038 individuals registered with hypertension from 2018-2021, 69% were under care in 2022. Nearly half of those under care (129,720/273,355) received treatment from HWCs in 2022. Care of hypertensive individuals from district hospitals (14%), community health centres (20%), and primary health centres (24%) were decentralized to HWCs. Overall BP control rose from 20% (4,004/20,347) in 2019 to 58% (157,595/273,355) in 2022, while missed visits decreased from 61% (12,394/20,347) in 2019 to 26% (70,894/273,355) in 2022. This trend was consistent in both states. HWCs exhibited the highest BP control and the lowest missed visits throughout the study period compared to other facility types.

conclusionWe documented an increase in decentralized access to hypertension treatment and improved treatment outcomes over four years. We recommend operationalizing hypertension care at HWCs to other districts in India to improve BP control.

Indexed as

HypertensionAdultAgedFemaleHumansIndiaMaleMiddle AgedPatient-Centered CarePoliticsBlood pressureDecentralizationHealth systemHypertensionImplementationIndiaNon-communicable diseasesPatient-centric carePrimary health care

Identifiers

PMID39095821
PMCPMC11297667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.