ArticleBMC cancer2024
The addition of nimotuzumab during concurrent chemoradiotherapy improved survival outcomes in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with optimal response to induction chemotherapy.
Article in BMC cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Precision management of radiotherapy interruption in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Induction chemotherapy counteracts the survival impact in high-risk patients defined by a novel model.Translational oncology · 2026Article
- Biogenic gold nanoparticles synthesized fromOpen life sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the impact of response to induction chemotherapy (IC) on survival outcomes in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LANPC) and evaluate the efficacy of adding nimotuzumab to concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) based on different responses to IC.
methodsWe retrospectively included patients with stage III-IVA NPC who underwent IC with and without nimotuzumab during CCRT. Statistical analysis included the chi-square test, propensity score matching, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and Cox proportional hazards model.
resultsAmong 383 identified patients, 216 (56.4%) received nimotuzumab during CCRT, while 167 (43.6%) did not. Following IC, 269 (70.2%) patients showed a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), and 114 (29.8%) had stable disease (SD) or progressive disease (PD). The response to IC independently influenced disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Patients achieving CR/PR demonstrated significantly higher 3-year DFS (80.3% vs. 70.6%, P = 0.031) and OS (90.9% vs. 83.2%, P = 0.038) than those with SD/PD. The addition of nimotuzumab during CCRT significantly improved DFS (P = 0.006) and OS (P = 0.037) for CR/PR patients but not for those with SD/PD.
conclusionsThis study emphasizes the importance of IC response in LANPC and highlights the potential benefits of nimotuzumab during CCRT for improving survival outcomes in CR/PR patients. Tailored treatment approaches for SD/PD patients warrant further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.