Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39095613›Full record

ReviewPediatric radiology2025

Let's talk about radiation dose and radiation protection in children.

Claudio Granata, Carmelo Sofia, Mariantonietta Francavilla, Marek Kardos, Joanna Kasznia-Brown, Rutger Aj Nievelstein, Bogdan Stefan Olteanu, Catherine Owens, Sergio Salerno, Erich Sorantin and 1 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Choanal atresia repair in Europe and the world - a comprehensive investigation of the current state of care.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Impact of pretreatment PET/MRI on radiooncologic target delineation in Hodgkin's lymphoma: a case series.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. How to talk to parents.Pediatric radiology · 2025
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Claudio GranataDepartment of Radiology, Institute for Maternal and Child Health - IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Via Dell'Istria, 65, 34137, Trieste, TS, Italy. cgranata@sirm.org.ORCID 0000-0003-3072-4096
Carmelo SofiaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Morphologic and Functional Imaging, University of Messina, Policlinico "G. Martino", Messina, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6021-4658
Mariantonietta FrancavillaDepartment of Paediatric Radiology, AOUC Policlinico - Giovanni XXIII Paediatric Hospital, Bari, Italy.
Marek KardosDepartment of Functional Diagnostics, Children's Cardiac Center, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Joanna Kasznia-BrownDepartment of Radiology, Musgrove Park Hospital, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Rutger Aj NievelsteinDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht & Princess Máxima Center for Paediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Bogdan Stefan OlteanuDepartment of Radiology, Emergency Hospital for Children "Grigore Alexandrescu", Bucharest, Romania.
Catherine Owens, London, UK.
Sergio SalernoUOC di Radiologia Pediatrica, ARNAS Civico, Palermo, Italy.
Erich Sorantin, Wien, Austria.
Ilze ApineDepartment of Radiology, Riga Stradin's University, Riga, Latvia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Children are more sensitive to ionizing radiation than adults. Even though the risk is very low, exposure from radiological examinations can possibly cause them long-term side effects. Recent large epidemiological studies involving children and young adults have added evidence suggesting that even small doses of radiation, such as those from computed tomography scans, might slightly increase the risk of developing cancer later in life. Therefore, even though radiologic studies are essential for an accurate diagnosis and management of various conditions, it is crucial to minimize radiation exposure. This article addresses radiation protection for children in the medical use of ionizing radiation and it is set in the context of the European legislative framework regarding radiation protection. It advocates for a holistic approach to paediatric radiological tests. This approach includes the key principles of radiation protection, such as the justification of imaging procedures supported by referral guidelines, as well as the optimization of techniques (according to the ALARA principle) and effective communication with parents about the benefits and the risks of radiologic procedures. Protecting children from unnecessary radiation is not only a technical challenge, but also a moral obligation and a legal requirement.

Indexed as

PediatricsRadiation DosageRadiation ExposureRadiation InjuriesRadiation ProtectionChildHumansChildDiagnostic reference levelsRadiation protectionRadiology

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.