ArticleScientific reports2024
GRU-powered sleep stage classification with permutation-based EEG channel selection.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sleep stage classification from ECG using machine learning: Evaluating the impact of signal duration.Neurobiology of sleep and circadian rhythms · 2026Article
- State-Dependent CNN-GRU Reinforcement Framework for Robust EEG-Based Sleep Stage Classification.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- STCCA: Spatial-Temporal Coupled Cross-Attention Through Hierarchical Network for EEG-Based Speech Recognition.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Remote Sensing Target Tracking Method Based on Super-Resolution Reconstruction and Hybrid Networks.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
- Unlocking Dreams and Dreamless Sleep: Machine Learning Classification With Optimal EEG Channels.BioMed research international · 2025Article
- Applications of Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) Networks in Polymeric Sciences: A Review.Polymers · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We present a new approach to classifying the sleep stage that incorporates a computationally inexpensive method based on permutations for channel selection and takes advantage of deep learning power, specifically the gated recurrent unit (GRU) model, along with other deep learning methods. By systematically permuting the electroencephalographic (EEG) channels, different combinations of EEG channels are evaluated to identify the most informative subset for the classification of the 5-class sleep stage. For analysis, we used an EEG dataset that was collected at the International Institute for Integrative Sleep Medicine (WPI-IIIS) at the University of Tsukuba in Japan. The results of these explorations provide many new insights such as the (1) drastic decrease in performance when channels are fewer than 3, (2) 3-random channels selected by permutation provide the same or better prediction than the 3 channels recommended by the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM), (3) N1 class suffers the most in prediction accuracy as the channels drop from 128 to 3 random or 3 AASM, and (4) no single channel provides acceptable levels of accuracy in the prediction of 5 classes. The results obtained show the GRU's ability to retain essential temporal information from EEG data, which allows capturing the underlying patterns associated with each sleep stage effectively. Using permutation-based channel selection, we enhance or at least maintain as high model efficiency as when using high-density EEG, incorporating only the most informative EEG channels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.