ReviewJournal of human genetics2024
Efficient HLA imputation from sequential SNPs data by transformer.
Review in Journal of human genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- The digital keystone: how artificial intelligence is reshaping HLA research and clinical practice.Immunogenetics · 2026Review
- Computational identification of B- and T-cell epitopes: a unified task taxonomy and review of databases, datasets, predictive pipelines, and gaps.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- STICI: Split-Transformer with integrated convolutions for genotype imputation.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Genotype imputation methods for whole and complex genomic regions utilizing deep learning technology.Journal of human genetics · 2024Review
- Aligned deep neural network for integrative analysis with high-dimensional input.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2023Article
- Machine learning models for pharmacogenomic variant effect predictions - recent developments and future frontiers.PharmacogenomicsReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genes are associated with a variety of diseases, yet the direct typing of HLA alleles is both time-consuming and costly. Consequently, various imputation methods leveraging sequential single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) data have been proposed, employing either statistical or deep learning models, such as the convolutional neural network (CNN)-based model, DEEP*HLA. However, these methods exhibit limited imputation efficiency for infrequent alleles and necessitate a large size of reference dataset. In this context, we have developed a Transformer-based model to HLA allele imputation, named "HLA Reliable IMpuatioN by Transformer (HLARIMNT)" designed to exploit the sequential nature of SNPs data. We evaluated HLARIMNT's performance using two distinct reference panels; Pan-Asian reference panel (n = 530) and Type 1 Diabetes genetics Consortium (T1DGC) reference panel (n = 5225), alongside a combined panel (n = 1060). HLARIMNT demonstrated superior accuracy to DEEP*HLA across several indices, particularly for infrequent alleles. Furthermore, we explored the impact of varying training data sizes on imputation accuracy, finding that HLARIMNT consistently outperformed across all data size. These findings suggest that Transformer-based models can efficiently impute not only HLA types but potentially other gene types from sequential SNPs data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.