Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39095607›Full record

ReviewJournal of human genetics2024

Efficient HLA imputation from sequential SNPs data by transformer.

Kaho Tanaka, Kosuke Kato, Naoki Nonaka, Jun Seita

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of human genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kaho TanakaFaculty of Engineering, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Kosuke KatoAdvanced Data Science Project, RIKEN Information R&D and Strategy Headquarters, RIKEN, Tokyo, Japan.
Naoki NonakaAdvanced Data Science Project, RIKEN Information R&D and Strategy Headquarters, RIKEN, Tokyo, Japan.
Jun SeitaAdvanced Data Science Project, RIKEN Information R&D and Strategy Headquarters, RIKEN, Tokyo, Japan. jun.seita@riken.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3008-3615

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genes are associated with a variety of diseases, yet the direct typing of HLA alleles is both time-consuming and costly. Consequently, various imputation methods leveraging sequential single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) data have been proposed, employing either statistical or deep learning models, such as the convolutional neural network (CNN)-based model, DEEP*HLA. However, these methods exhibit limited imputation efficiency for infrequent alleles and necessitate a large size of reference dataset. In this context, we have developed a Transformer-based model to HLA allele imputation, named "HLA Reliable IMpuatioN by Transformer (HLARIMNT)" designed to exploit the sequential nature of SNPs data. We evaluated HLARIMNT's performance using two distinct reference panels; Pan-Asian reference panel (n = 530) and Type 1 Diabetes genetics Consortium (T1DGC) reference panel (n = 5225), alongside a combined panel (n = 1060). HLARIMNT demonstrated superior accuracy to DEEP*HLA across several indices, particularly for infrequent alleles. Furthermore, we explored the impact of varying training data sizes on imputation accuracy, finding that HLARIMNT consistently outperformed across all data size. These findings suggest that Transformer-based models can efficiently impute not only HLA types but potentially other gene types from sequential SNPs data.

Indexed as

AllelesHLA AntigensPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAlgorithmsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Gene FrequencyGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansNeural Networks, ComputerHLA Antigens

Identifiers

PMID39095607
PMCPMC11422163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.