ArticleDiscover oncology2024
Exploring prognostic DNA methylation genes in bladder cancer: a comprehensive analysis.
Article in Discover oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A multi-modal approach for decision making in bladder cancer.Nature reviews. Urology · 2026Review
- Article
- Multi-omics characterization identifies AHCY as a prognostic biomarker driving immunometabolic reprogramming in bladder cancer.Translational oncology · 2026Article
- Intervention of machine learning in bladder cancer research using multi-omics datasets: systematic review on biomarker identification.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- Epigenetic Biomarkers as a New Diagnostic Tool in Bladder Cancer-From Early Detection to Prognosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The current study aimed to investigate the status of genes with prognostic DNA methylation sites in bladder cancer (BLCA). We obtained bulk transcriptome sequencing data, methylation data, and single-cell sequencing data of BLCA from public databases. Initially, Cox survival analysis was conducted for each methylation site, and genes with more than 10 methylation sites demonstrating prognostic significance were identified to form the BLCA prognostic methylation gene set. Subsequently, the intersection of marker genes associated with epithelial cells in single-cell sequencing analysis was obtained to acquire epithelial cell prognostic methylation genes. Utilizing ten machine learning algorithms for multiple combinations, we selected key genes (METRNL, SYT8, COL18A1, TAP1, MEST, AHNAK, RPP21, AKAP13, RNH1) based on the C-index from multiple validation sets. Single-factor and multi-factor Cox analyses were conducted incorporating clinical characteristics and model genes to identify independent prognostic factors (AHNAK, RNH1, TAP1, Age, and Stage) for constructing a Nomogram model, which was validated for its good diagnostic efficacy, prognostic prediction ability, and clinical decision-making benefits. Expression patterns of model genes varied among different clinical features. Seven immune cell infiltration prediction algorithms were used to assess the correlation between immune cell scores and Nomogram scores. Finally, drug sensitivity analysis of Nomogram model genes was conducted based on the CMap database, followed by molecular docking experiments. Our research offers a reference and theoretical basis for prognostic evaluation, drug selection, and understanding the impact of DNA methylation changes on the prognosis of BLCA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.