Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39095554›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical ecology2024

Electrophysiological Responses of Trissolcus japonicus, T. basalis, and T. oenone (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae) to Volatile Compounds Associated with New Zealand Stink Bugs (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae).

Thomas E Saunders, Lee-Anne M Manning, Gonzalo A Avila, Gregory I Holwell, Kye Chung Park

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical ecology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Thomas E SaundersTe Kura Mātauranga Koiora, School of Biological Sciences, Waipapa Taumata Rau, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand. Tom.Saunders@auckland.ac.nz.
Lee-Anne M ManningThe New Zealand Institute for Plant & Food Research Limited, Auckland, New Zealand.
Gonzalo A AvilaThe New Zealand Institute for Plant & Food Research Limited, Auckland, New Zealand. Gonzalo.Avila@plantandfood.co.nz.
Gregory I HolwellTe Kura Mātauranga Koiora, School of Biological Sciences, Waipapa Taumata Rau, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand.
Kye Chung ParkThe New Zealand Institute for Plant & Food Research Limited, Auckland, New Zealand.

Funding

Ministry for Primary Industries P/321021/10
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parasitoid biological control agents rely heavily on olfaction to locate their hosts. Chemical cues associated with hosts and non-hosts are known to influence the expression of host preferences and host-specificity. A better understanding of how and why parasitoids attack some species and not others, based on volatile organic compounds associated with potential hosts, can provide key information on the parasitoid's host preferences, which could be applied to pre-release risk assessments for classical biological control agents. Electrophysiological techniques such as electroantennography (EAG) and GC-EAD (gas chromatography coupled with electroantennographic detection) are widely used to identify bioactive semiochemicals. But the application of these techniques to understanding how chemical ecological cues mediate parasitoid host specificity has not been as thoroughly explored. We conducted GC-EAD and EAG studies to identify olfactory-active compounds associated with adult females of nine stink bug species from Aotearoa/New Zealand on the antennae of three closely related parasitoid species: Trissolcus japonicus Ashmead, a pre-emptively (= proactively) approved biocontrol agent against brown marmorated stink bug; T. basalis (Wollaston), a biocontrol agent introduced against Nezara viridula L. in 1949; and T. oenone Johnson, a native Australasian pentatomid parasitoid. Eight compounds associated with stink bugs elicited antennal responses from all three parasitoids, and we were able to identify seven of these. (E)-2-hexenal, (E)-4-oxo-2-hexenal, (E)-2-octenal and (E)-2-decenal generally elicited stronger responses in the three parasitoids, while n-tridecane, n-dodecane, and (E)-2-decenyl acetate elicited weaker responses. We discuss how and why the results from electrophysiological experiments can be applied to non-target risk assessments within biological control programmes.

Indexed as

Volatile Organic CompoundsAldehydesAnimalsArthropod AntennaeElectrophysiological PhenomenaFemaleHemipteraHeteropteraHost-Parasite InteractionsHymenopteraNew ZealandPheromonesWaspsAldehydesPheromonesVolatile Organic CompoundsElectrophysiologyHost ChemistryHost RangeNon-Target RisksParasitism

Identifiers

PMID39095554
PMCPMC11717797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.