Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39095534›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutical research2024

Machine Learning Prediction of On/Off Target-driven Clinical Adverse Events.

Albert Cao, Luchen Zhang, Yingzi Bu, Duxin Sun

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Albert Cao *Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, United States.
Luchen Zhang *Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, United States.
Yingzi Bu *Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, United States.
Duxin SunDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, United States. duxins@umich.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6406-2126

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveCurrently, 90% of clinical drug development fails, where 30% of these failures are due to clinical toxicity. The current extensive animal toxicity studies are not predictive of clinical adverse events (AEs) at clinical doses, while current computation models only consider very few factors with limited success in clinical toxicity prediction. We aimed to address these issues by developing a machine learning (ML) model to directly predict clinical AEs.

methodsUsing a dataset with 759 FDA-approved drugs with known AEs, we first adapted the ConPLex ML model to predict IC

resultsThe adapted ConPLex model predicted drug-target interactions for both on- and off-target effects, as shown by co-localization of the 6 small molecule kinase inhibitors with their respective kinases. The coupled ML models demonstrated good predictive capability of clinical AEs, with accuracy over 75%.

conclusionsOur approach provides a new insight into the mechanistic understanding of in vivo drug toxicity in relationship with drug on-/off-target interactions. The coupled ML models, once validated with larger datasets, may offer advantages to directly predict clinical AEs using in vitro/ex vivo and preclinical data, which will help to reduce drug development failure due to clinical toxicity.

Indexed as

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsMachine LearningAnimalsDrug DevelopmentHumansProtein Kinase InhibitorsProtein Kinase InhibitorsAdverse eventsDrug tissue distributionMachine learningOff-targetOn-target

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.