ArticlePharmaceutical research2024
Machine Learning Prediction of On/Off Target-driven Clinical Adverse Events.
Article in Pharmaceutical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Machine learning models for adverse drug reaction prediction. A systematic review and three-level multilevel meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Progress and current trends in prediction models for the occurrence and prognosis of cancer and cancer-related complications: a bibliometric and visualization analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Chemical Epigenetics: Small Molecules Targeting Chromatin Modifiers in Disease Modulation.Cell biochemistry and biophysics · 2026Review
- Machine Learning in Preclinical Development of Antiviral Peptide Candidates: A Review of the Current Landscape.Viruses · 2026Review
- Integrating prior knowledge inference with computational multi-omics analysis to reveal host antiviral networks of natural compounds against influenza A virus.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveCurrently, 90% of clinical drug development fails, where 30% of these failures are due to clinical toxicity. The current extensive animal toxicity studies are not predictive of clinical adverse events (AEs) at clinical doses, while current computation models only consider very few factors with limited success in clinical toxicity prediction. We aimed to address these issues by developing a machine learning (ML) model to directly predict clinical AEs.
methodsUsing a dataset with 759 FDA-approved drugs with known AEs, we first adapted the ConPLex ML model to predict IC
resultsThe adapted ConPLex model predicted drug-target interactions for both on- and off-target effects, as shown by co-localization of the 6 small molecule kinase inhibitors with their respective kinases. The coupled ML models demonstrated good predictive capability of clinical AEs, with accuracy over 75%.
conclusionsOur approach provides a new insight into the mechanistic understanding of in vivo drug toxicity in relationship with drug on-/off-target interactions. The coupled ML models, once validated with larger datasets, may offer advantages to directly predict clinical AEs using in vitro/ex vivo and preclinical data, which will help to reduce drug development failure due to clinical toxicity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39095534What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.