Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39095467›Full record

SynthesisEye (London, England)2024

Topical NSAIDs impact on macular oedema and visual outcome after phacoemulsification: systematic review of RCTs with network meta-analysis.

Malaz Almasri, Abdulrahman Ismaiel, Iulia Gavris, Daniel-Corneliu Leucuta, Monica M Gavris, Simona Delia Nicoara

Abstract readSystematic ReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Eye (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Malaz AlmasriDepartment of Ophthalmology of Military Emergency Hospital "Dr. Constantin Papilian", Cluj-Napoca, 400132, Romania.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3813-3525
Abdulrahman Ismaiel2nd Department of Internal Medicine, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, 400006, Romania.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7435-271X
Iulia Gavris"Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Daniel-Corneliu LeucutaDepartment of Medical Informatics and Biostatistics, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, 400349, Romania. dleucuta@umfcluj.ro.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4218-8622
Monica M GavrisDepartment of Ophthalmology of Military Emergency Hospital "Dr. Constantin Papilian", Cluj-Napoca, 400132, Romania.
Simona Delia NicoaraDepartment of Ophthalmology, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, ClujNapoca, 400394, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this Network Meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy of the different topical Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) when added or not to topical steroids in preventing the thickening of the macula and their impact on visual acuity and intraocular pressure after phacoemulsification. Five electronic databases were searched, including PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Our primary outcome was one-month post-surgery visual outcome. We also considered change in Foveal thickness (FT) and Intraocular pressure (IOP) at one-month post-surgery. We summarized our analyses by calculating the mean differences (MD) with associated 95% confidence intervals (CI) using restricted maximum likelihood in random effects models for continuous outcomes. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed with Cochrane Collaboration's tool. The network meta-analysis was conducted using frequentist approach considering Nepafenac 0.1% as a reference medication. Eleven Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including 2175 subjects were selected for quantitative analysis. At one-month post-surgery, Bromfenac had statistically significant better visual acuity compared to Nepafenac 0.1% (p < 0.001), regarding FT, Nepafenac 0.3% had the least increase in FT compared to Nepafenac 0.1% (p = 0.09), regarding IOP, Diclofenac had the lowest IOP. No significant results regarding FT and IOP. Interestingly Ketorolac had the worst results regarding BCVA and IOP, and came last but one for FT. Overall, our network meta-analysis demonstrated that Bromfenac was associated with a significant improvement in visual acuity compared to Nepafenac 0.1% at one-month following cataract surgery, while Nepafenac 0.3% was associated with the least increase in foveal thickness.

Indexed as

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalMacular EdemaPhacoemulsificationVisual AcuityAdministration, TopicalBenzeneacetamidesBromobenzenesHumansIntraocular PressureOphthalmic SolutionsPhenylacetatesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalBenzeneacetamidesBromobenzenesnepafenacOphthalmic SolutionsPhenylacetates

Identifiers

PMID39095467
PMCPMC11584663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.