Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39095406›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Developing an optimised method for accurate wear testing of dental materials using the 'Rub&Roll' device.

Eva Maier, Jan Ruben, William M Palin, Ewald Bronkhorst, Manuel Olmos, Ragai Edward Matta, Bas Loomans

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Eva MaierDepartment of Operative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Glueckstrasse 11, 91054, Erlangen, Germany. eva.maier@fau.de.
Jan RubenDepartment of Dentistry, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
William M PalinDental and Biomaterials Science, School of Dentistry, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Ewald BronkhorstDepartment of Dentistry, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Manuel OlmosDepartment of Oral and Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Ragai Edward MattaDepartment of Prosthodontics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Bas LoomansDepartment of Dentistry, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Funding

Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Research (IZKF) at the University Hospital of the University of Erlangen-Nuremberg Junior Project J103
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dental materials are challenged by wear processes in the oral environment and should be evaluated in laboratory tests prior to clinical use. Many laboratory wear-testing devices are high-cost investments and not available for cross-centre comparisons. The 'Rub&Roll' wear machine enables controlled application of force, chemical and mechanical loading, but the initial design was not able to test against rigid antagonist materials. The current study aimed to probe the sensitivity of a new 'Rub&Roll' set-up by evaluating the effect of force and test solution parameters (deionized water; water + abrasive medium; acid + abrasive medium) on the wear behaviour of direct and indirect dental resin-based composites (RBCs) compared with human molars against 3D-printed rod antagonists. Molars exhibited greater height loss than RBCs in all test groups, with the largest differences recorded with acidic solutions. Direct RBCs showed significantly greater wear than indirect RBCs in the groups containing abrasive media. The acidic + abrasive medium did not result in increased wear of RBC materials. The developed method using the 'Rub&Roll' wear machine in the current investigation has provided a sensitive wear test method to allow initial screening of resin-based composite materials compared with extracted human molars under the influence of different mechanical and erosive challenges.

Indexed as

Composite ResinsDental MaterialsMaterials TestingHumansMolarSurface PropertiesComposite ResinsDental MaterialsAbrasionDental materialsErosionLaboratory test methodResin-based compositesWear

Identifiers

PMID39095406
PMCPMC11297336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.