Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39095393›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

The influence of biotic and abiotic factors on the bacterial microbiome of gentoo penguins (Pygoscelis papua) in their natural environment.

Chloe Kaczvinsky, Hila Levy, Stephen Preston, Casey Youngflesh, Gemma Clucas, Heather J Lynch, Tom Hart, Adrian L Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chloe Kaczvinsky *Department of Biology, University of Oxford, 11a Mansfield Road, Oxford, OX1 3SZ, UK.
Hila Levy *Office of Science and Technology Policy, Executive Office of the President, 1650 Pennsylvania Avenue, Washington, DC, 20504, USA.
Stephen PrestonDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, 11a Mansfield Road, Oxford, OX1 3SZ, UK.
Casey YoungfleshDepartment of Biological Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, 29634, USA.
Gemma ClucasCornell Lab of Ornithology, 159 Sapsucker Woods Rd., Ithaca, NY, 14850, USA.
Heather J LynchDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, 11794, USA.
Tom HartOxford Brookes University, Gypsy Lane, Headington, Oxford, OX3 0BP, UK. t.hart@brookes.ac.uk.
Adrian L SmithDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, 11a Mansfield Road, Oxford, OX1 3SZ, UK. adrian.smith@biology.ox.ac.uk.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/K004468/1Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, UK Government OD0221Save Our Seas Foundation SOSF539
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The microbiome is a key factor in the health, well-being, and success of vertebrates, contributing to the adaptive capacity of the host. However, the impact of geographic and biotic factors that may affect the microbiome of wild birds in polar environments is not well defined. To address this, we determined the bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequence profiles in faecal samples from pygoscelid penguin populations in the Scotia Arc, focusing on gentoo penguins. This mesopredatory group breeds in defined colonies across a wide geographic range. Since diet could influence microbiome structure, we extracted dietary profiles from a eukaryotic 18S rRNA gene sequence profile. The bacterial microbiome profiles were considered in the context of a diverse set of environmental and ecological measures. Integrating wide geographic sampling with bacterial 16S and eukaryotic 18S rRNA gene sequencing of over 350 faecal samples identified associations between the microbiome profile and a suite of geographic and ecological factors. Microbiome profiles differed according to host species, colony identity, distance between colonies, and diet. Interestingly there was also a relationship between the proportion of host DNA (in relation to total 18S rRNA gene signal) and the microbiome, which may reflect gut passage time. Colony identity provided the strongest association with differences in microbiome profiles indicating that local factors play a key role in the microbiome structure of these polar seabirds. This may reflect the influence of local transfer of microbes either via faecal-oral routes, during chick feeding or other close contact events. Other factors including diet and host species also associate with variation in microbiome profile, and in at least some locations, the microbiome composition varies considerably between individuals. Given the variation in penguin microbiomes associated with diverse factors there is potential for disruption of microbiome associations at a local scale that could influence host health, productivity, and immunological competence. The microbiome represents a sensitive indicator of changing conditions, and the implications of any changes need to be considered in the wider context of environmental change and other stressors.

Indexed as

FecesMicrobiotaRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSpheniscidaeAnimalsBacteriaDietGastrointestinal MicrobiomeRNA, Ribosomal, 18SRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 18SDietGentoo penguinsMicrobiomeMonitoringPygoscelid penguins

Identifiers

PMID39095393
PMCPMC11297207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.