ArticleScientific reports2024
The impact of fine-tuning paradigms on unknown plant diseases recognition.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Few-shot crop pests and diseases recognition based on adversarial augmentation and task interpolation.Plant methods · 2026Article
- Comprehensive plant health monitoring: expert-level assessment with spatio-temporal image data.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Enhancing anomaly detection in plant disease recognition with knowledge ensemble.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Leveraging enhanced egret swarm optimization algorithm and artificial intelligence-driven prompt strategies for portfolio selection.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Plant diseases pose significant threats to agriculture, impacting both food safety and public health. Traditional plant disease detection systems are typically limited to recognizing disease categories included in the training dataset, rendering them ineffective against new disease types. Although out-of-distribution (OOD) detection methods have been proposed to address this issue, the impact of fine-tuning paradigms on these methods has been overlooked. This paper focuses on studying the impact of fine-tuning paradigms on the performance of detecting unknown plant diseases. Currently, fine-tuning on visual tasks is mainly divided into visual-based models and visual-language-based models. We first discuss the limitations of large-scale visual language models in this task: textual prompts are difficult to design. To avoid the side effects of textual prompts, we futher explore the effectiveness of purely visual pre-trained models for OOD detection in plant disease tasks. Specifically, we employed five publicly accessible datasets to establish benchmarks for open-set recognition, OOD detection, and few-shot learning in plant disease recognition. Additionally, we comprehensively compared various OOD detection methods, fine-tuning paradigms, and factors affecting OOD detection performance, such as sample quantity. The results show that visual prompt tuning outperforms fully fine-tuning and linear probe tuning in out-of-distribution detection performance, especially in the few-shot scenarios. Notably, the max-logit-based on visual prompt tuning achieves an AUROC score of 94.8
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.