ArticleHematology, transfusion and cell therapy2024
Relationship between response to first-line steroid treatment in adult immune thrombocytopenic purpura and the course of the disease.
Article in Hematology, transfusion and cell therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundImmune thrombocytopenic purpura, a recurrent autoimmune disease, is characterized by thrombocytopenia, purpura and hemorrhagic episodes with the main factor in the pathogenesis of this disease being autoantibodies against platelets. Since the 1950s, first-line treatment has been glucocorticoids that have indirect and direct effects on thrombocytopenia. Although the characteristics associated with the chronicization of immune thrombocytopenic purpura at the time of diagnosis have been investigated in previous studies, no study was found in the literature investigating the relationship between the response to first-line steroid treatment and the course of the disease, the aim of this study. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective, single center study revisited electronic files of patients with a diagnosis of immune thrombocytopenic purpura between September 2012 and September at the Department of Clinical Hematology, Selcuk University Faculty of Medicine 2022. The platelet count had been confirmed by peripheral blood smears of patients with a platelet count ≤30 × 10
resultsA total of 100 patients were included in the study; 73 % were in the young (19-65 years old) and 27 % in the old (>65 years old) age group. Most of the patients were female (69 %). Forty-one patients were hospitalized without bleeding. The complete response rate to first-line treatment was 61 %. There was no significant difference between the agents given in first-line treatment in terms of response and length of remission.
conclusionThe main purpose of immune thrombocytopenic purpura treatment is to prevent severe bleeding rather than bringing the platelet count to normal values. Glucocorticoids, the first step of treatment, provide high response rates. There is no significant difference between glucocorticoid agents in terms of response to treatment and long-term remission. The points to be considered in the selection of glucocorticoid agents are the side effect profiles, ease of administration and individualization of treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.