Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39095047›Full record

ArticleTrends in hearing

The Impact of Hearing Aids on Listening Effort and Listening-Related Fatigue - Investigations in a Virtual Realistic Listening Environment.

M Blümer, J Heeren, B Mirkovic, M Latzel, C Gordon, D Crowhen, M Meis, K Wagener, M Schulte

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

M BlümerDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0009-0005-5263-7876
J HeerenHörzentrum Oldenburg gGmbH, Oldenburg, Germany.
B MirkovicDepartment of Psychology, University of Oldenburg School VI-Medicine and Health Sciences, Oldenburg, Germany.
M LatzelSonova Holding AG, Stäfa, Switzerland.
C GordonSonova New Zealand, Auckland, New Zealand.
D CrowhenSonova New Zealand, Auckland, New Zealand.
M MeisHörzentrum Oldenburg gGmbH, Oldenburg, Germany.
K WagenerHörzentrum Oldenburg gGmbH, Oldenburg, Germany.
M SchulteHörzentrum Oldenburg gGmbH, Oldenburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3478-7385

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Participation in complex listening situations such as group conversations in noisy environments sets high demands on the auditory system and on cognitive processing. Reports of hearing-impaired people indicate that strenuous listening situations occurring throughout the day lead to feelings of fatigue at the end of the day. The aim of the present study was to develop a suitable test sequence to evoke and measure listening effort (LE) and listening-related fatigue (LRF), and, to evaluate the influence of hearing aid use on both dimensions in mild to moderately hearing-impaired participants. The chosen approach aims to reconstruct a representative acoustic day (Time Compressed Acoustic Day [TCAD]) by means of an eight-part hearing-test sequence with a total duration of approximately 2½ h. For this purpose, the hearing test sequence combined four different listening tasks with five different acoustic scenarios and was presented to the 20 test subjects using virtual acoustics in an open field measurement in aided and unaided conditions. Besides subjective ratings of LE and LRF, behavioral measures (response accuracy, reaction times), and an attention test (d2-R) were performed prior to and after the TCAD. Furthermore, stress hormones were evaluated by taking salivary samples. Subjective ratings of LRF increased throughout the test sequence. This effect was observed to be higher when testing unaided. In three of the eight listening tests, the aided condition led to significantly faster reaction times/response accuracies than in the unaided condition. In the d2-R test, an interaction in processing speed between time (pre- vs. post-TCAD) and provision (unaided vs. aided) was found suggesting an influence of hearing aid provision on LRF. A comparison of the averaged subjective ratings at the beginning and end of the TCAD shows a significant increase in LRF for both conditions. At the end of the TCAD, subjective fatigue was significantly lower when wearing hearing aids. The analysis of stress hormones did not reveal significant effects.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationHearing AidsNoiseAdultAgedAttentionAuditory FatigueAuditory PerceptionAuditory ThresholdCorrection of Hearing ImpairmentFatigueFemaleHearingHearing LossHumansMaleecological validityhearing aid uselistening effortlistening-related fatiguetime compressed acoustic day (TCAD)

Identifiers

PMID39095047
PMCPMC11378347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.