Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39094569›Full record

ArticleCell2024

The fork protection complex promotes parental histone recycling and epigenetic memory.

Sebastian Jespersen Charlton, Valentin Flury, Yutaka Kanoh, Aitana Victoria Genzor, Leonie Kollenstart, Wantong Ao, Peter Brøgger, Melanie Bianca Weisser, Marek Adamus, Nicolas Alcaraz and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. A Self-Organized Liquid Reaction Container for Cellular Memory.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Claspin and Cancer: Where Are We Now?International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Sebastian Jespersen CharltonDepartment of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen 2200, Denmark; Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen 2200, Denmark.
Valentin FluryNovo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen 2200, Denmark.
Yutaka KanohTokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, Tokyo 156-8506, Japan.
Aitana Victoria GenzorDepartment of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen 2200, Denmark.
Leonie KollenstartNovo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen 2200, Denmark.
Wantong AoDepartment of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen 2200, Denmark.
Peter BrøggerDepartment of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen 2200, Denmark.
Melanie Bianca WeisserNovo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen 2200, Denmark.
Marek AdamusNovo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen 2200, Denmark.
Nicolas AlcarazNovo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen 2200, Denmark.
Charlotte M Delvaux de FenffeHubrecht Institute-KNAW & University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Francesca MattiroliHubrecht Institute-KNAW & University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Guillermo MontoyaNovo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen 2200, Denmark.
Hisao MasaiTokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, Tokyo 156-8506, Japan.
Anja GrothNovo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen 2200, Denmark; Biotech Research & Innovation Centre, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen 2200, Denmark; Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen 2200, Denmark. Electronic address: anja.groth@cpr.ku.dk.
Geneviève ThonDepartment of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen 2200, Denmark. Electronic address: gen@bio.ku.dk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The inheritance of parental histones across the replication fork is thought to mediate epigenetic memory. Here, we reveal that fission yeast Mrc1 (CLASPIN in humans) binds H3-H4 tetramers and operates as a central coordinator of symmetric parental histone inheritance. Mrc1 mutants in a key connector domain disrupted segregation of parental histones to the lagging strand comparable to Mcm2 histone-binding mutants. Both mutants showed clonal and asymmetric loss of H3K9me-mediated gene silencing. AlphaFold predicted co-chaperoning of H3-H4 tetramers by Mrc1 and Mcm2, with the Mrc1 connector domain bridging histone and Mcm2 binding. Biochemical and functional analysis validated this model and revealed a duality in Mrc1 function: disabling histone binding in the connector domain disrupted lagging-strand recycling while another histone-binding mutation impaired leading strand recycling. We propose that Mrc1 toggles histones between the lagging and leading strand recycling pathways, in part by intra-replisome co-chaperoning, to ensure epigenetic transmission to both daughter cells.

Indexed as

DNA ReplicationEpigenesis, GeneticHistonesSchizosaccharomycesSchizosaccharomyces pombe ProteinsCell Cycle ProteinsEpigenetic MemoryMutationCell Cycle ProteinsHistonesSchizosaccharomyces pombe Proteinschromatin replicationClaspinDNA replicationepigenetic inheritanceepigenome maintenancefission yeastH3K9 methylationheterochromatinhistone chaperonehistone recyclingmouse embryonic stem cells

Identifiers

PMID39094569
PMCPMC11383432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.