Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39094110›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2024

Development of a Video Consultation Patient-Satisfaction Questionnaire (vCare-PSQ): A Cross-Sectional Explorative Study.

Anders Larrabee Sonderlund, Tessa Quirina Bang Van Sas, Sonja Wehberg, Linda Huibers, Jesper Bo Nielsen, Jens Søndergaard, Elisabeth Assing Hvidt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Primary care video consulting: a view from Northern Europe.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anders Larrabee SonderlundResearch Unit of General Practice, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6627-3322
Tessa Quirina Bang Van SasResearch Unit of General Practice, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3807-1014
Sonja WehbergResearch Unit of General Practice, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1503-2649
Linda HuibersResearch Unit of General Practice, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5048-3026
Jesper Bo NielsenResearch Unit of General Practice, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5764-5462
Jens SøndergaardResearch Unit of General Practice, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1629-1864
Elisabeth Assing HvidtResearch Unit of General Practice, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3762-8478

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSince the COVID-19 pandemic, the use of video consultation (VC) in primary care has expanded considerably in many countries. VC and other telehealth formats are often touted as a solution to improved health care access, with numerous studies showing high satisfaction with this care format among health professionals and patients. However, operationalization and measurement of patient satisfaction with VC varies across studies and often lacks consideration of dynamic contextual factors (eg, convenience, ease-of-use, or privacy) and doctor-patient relational variables that may influence patient satisfaction.

objectiveWe aim to develop a comprehensive and evidence-based questionnaire for assessing patient satisfaction with VC in general practice.

methodsThe vCare Patient-Satisfaction Questionnaire (the vCare-PSQ) was developed according to the COSMIN (Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments) guidelines. To achieve our overall objective, we pursued three aims: (1) a validation analysis of an existing patient-satisfaction scale (the PS-14), (2) an assessment of extrinsic contextual factors that may impact patient satisfaction, and (3) an assessment of pertinent intrinsic and relational satisfaction correlates (eg, health anxiety, information technology literacy, trust in the general practitioner, or convenience). For validation purposes, the questionnaire was filled out by a convenience sample of 188 Danish adults who had attended at least 1 VC.

resultsOur validation analysis of the PS-14 in a Danish population produced reliable results, indicating that the PS-14 is an appropriate measure of patient satisfaction with VC in Danish patient populations. Regressing situational and doctor-patient relational factors onto patient satisfaction further suggested that patient satisfaction is contingent on several factors not measured by the PS-14. These include information technology literacy and patient trust in the general practitioner, as well as several contextual pros and cons.

conclusionsSupplementing the PS-14 with dynamic measures of situational and doctor-patient relational factors may provide a more comprehensive understanding of patient satisfaction with VC. The vCare-PSQ may thus contribute to an enhanced methodological approach to assessing patient satisfaction with VC. We hope that the vCare-PSQ format may be useful for future research and implementation efforts regarding VC in a general practice setting.

Indexed as

adultadultsCOSMINCOVID-19Danishgeneral practicehealthcarehealth professionalhealth professionalsIT-literacymethodologicalpandemicpatient-physician relationshippatient satisfactionpilot-testingprimary careSARS-CoV-2telehealthvCare-PSQvideo consultation

Identifiers

PMID39094110
PMCPMC11329851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.