Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39093909›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Microalgae-based biofertilizer improves fruit yield and controls greenhouse gas emissions in a hawthorn orchard.

Fen Ma, Yingchun Li, Xue Han, Kuo Li, Mingyue Zhao, Liping Guo, Shifeng Li, Kangjie Wang, Kangxi Qin, Jian Duan and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. MicroalgaeBiology · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Fen MaInstitute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yingchun LiInstitute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5680-6121
Xue HanInstitute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Kuo LiInstitute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Mingyue ZhaoInstitute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Liping GuoInstitute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Shifeng LiShanxi School-Local Cooperative Microalgae Research Institute Co. Ltd., Yuncheng School-Local Cooperative Microalgae Research Institute, Yuncheng, China.
Kangjie WangShanxi School-Local Cooperative Microalgae Research Institute Co. Ltd., Yuncheng School-Local Cooperative Microalgae Research Institute, Yuncheng, China.
Kangxi QinShanxi School-Local Cooperative Microalgae Research Institute Co. Ltd., Yuncheng School-Local Cooperative Microalgae Research Institute, Yuncheng, China.
Jian DuanShanxi School-Local Cooperative Microalgae Research Institute Co. Ltd., Yuncheng School-Local Cooperative Microalgae Research Institute, Yuncheng, China.
Yutong LiuShanxi School-Local Cooperative Microalgae Research Institute Co. Ltd., Yuncheng School-Local Cooperative Microalgae Research Institute, Yuncheng, China.
Yuxuan XuShanxi School-Local Cooperative Microalgae Research Institute Co. Ltd., Yuncheng School-Local Cooperative Microalgae Research Institute, Yuncheng, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Raising attentions have focused on how to alleviate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from orchard system while simultaneously increase fruit production. Microalgae-based biofertilizer represents a promising resource for improving soil fertility and higher productivity. However, the effects of microalgae application more especially live microalgae on GHG emissions are understudied. In this study, fruit yield and quality, GHG emissions, as well as soil organic carbon and nitrogen fractions were examined in a hawthorn orchard, under the effects of live microalgae-based biofertilizer applied at three doses and two modes. Compared with conventional fertilization, microalgae improved hawthorn yield by 15.7%-29.6% with a maximal increment at medium dose by root application, and significantly increased soluble and reducing sugars contents at high dose. While microalgae did not increase GHG emissions except for nitrous oxide at high dose by root application, instead it significantly increased methane uptake by 1.5-2.3 times in root application. In addition, microalgae showed an increasing trend in soil organic carbon content, and significantly increased the contents of soil dissolved organic carbon and microbial biomass carbon, as well as soil ammonium nitrogen and dissolved organic nitrogen at medium dose with root application. Overall, the results indicated that the live microalgae could be used as a green biofertilizer for improving fruit yield without increasing GHG emissions intensity and the comprehensive greenhouse effect, in particular at medium dose with root application. We presume that if lowering chemical fertilizer rates, application of the live microalgae-based biofertilizer may help to reduce nitrous oxide emissions without compromising fruit yield and quality.

Indexed as

CrataegusFertilizersFruitGreenhouse GasesMicroalgaeNitrogenSoilBiomassCarbonMethaneNitrous OxideCarbonFertilizersGreenhouse GasesMethaneNitrogenNitrous OxideSoil

Identifiers

PMID39093909
PMCPMC11296634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.