ArticleIEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics2024
Mental Health and Mobile Communication Profiles of Crowdsourced Participants.
Article in IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Datasets of Smartphone Modalities for Depression Assessment: A Scoping Review.IEEE transactions on affective computingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) are highly prevalent and burdensome. To increase mental health screening rates, the digital health research community has been exploring the ability to augment self reporting instruments with digital logs. Crowdsourced workers are being increasingly recruited for behavioral health research studies as demographically representative samples are desired for later translational applications. Overshadowed by predictive modeling, descriptive modeling has the ability to expand knowledge and understanding of the clinical generalizability of models trained on data from crowdsourced participants. In this study, we identify mobile communication profiles of a crowdsourced sample. To achieve this, we cluster features derived from time series of call and text logs. The psychiatric, behavioral, and demographic characteristics were notably different across the four identified mobile communication profiles. For example, the profile that had the lowest average depression and anxiety screening scores only shared incoming text logs. This cluster had statistically significantly different depression and anxiety screening scores in comparison to the cluster that shared the most outgoing text logs. These profiles expose important insights regarding the generalizability of crowdsourced samples to more general clinical populations and increase understanding regarding the limitations of crowdsourced samples for translational mental health research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.