Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39093541›Full record

ArticleInternal and emergency medicine2024

Faster steroid-free remission with tocilizumab compared to methotrexate in giant cell arteritis: a real-life experience in two reference centres.

Luca Quartuccio, Elena Treppo, Maria De Martino, Maria Pillon, Simone Perniola, Dario Bruno, Miriam Isola, Elisa Gremese

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Internal and emergency medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Luca Quartuccio *Rheumatology Division, Department of Medicine (DMED), University of Udine, Udine, Italy. luca.quartuccio@uniud.it.ORCID 0000-0002-0134-6439
Elena Treppo *Rheumatology Division, Department of Medicine (DMED), University of Udine, Udine, Italy.
Maria De MartinoInstitute of Statistics, Department of Medicine (DMED), University of Udine, Udine, Italy.
Maria PillonRheumatology Division, Department of Medicine (DMED), University of Udine, Udine, Italy.
Simone PerniolaDivision of Rheumatology, Institute of Rheumatology and Affine Sciences, School of Medicine, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
Dario BrunoDivision of Rheumatology, Institute of Rheumatology and Affine Sciences, School of Medicine, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
Miriam IsolaInstitute of Statistics, Department of Medicine (DMED), University of Udine, Udine, Italy.
Elisa GremeseDivision of Rheumatology, Institute of Rheumatology and Affine Sciences, School of Medicine, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glucocorticoids (GCs) are still the mainstay of treatment of giant cell arteritis (GCA). Although GCs are highly effective in GCA, the high burden of toxicity of GCs as well as the disease relapse during GC tapering is well documented. To compare the efficacy and rapidity of TCZ and MTX as steroid-sparing agents in a real-life cohort of GCA patients. A retrospective analysis was conducted including patients with newly diagnosed GCA from the Rheumatology Units of Udine and Rome. The inclusion criterion was the treatment with TCZ or MTX as first steroid-sparing drug. 112 GCA patients (81 females) with a median age of 70 (IQ 65-75) years were collected. Thirty-one out of 112 (27.7%) patients were treated with TCZ (162 mg/week), while 81/112 (72.3%) patients received MTX (up to 20 mg/week) as a GC-sparing agent. At month 6 after GCA onset, 5/31 (16.1%) patients in TCZ group and none in MTX group were in GC-free sustained remission (p value = 0.001). Similarly, at month 12, 64.5% (20/31) and 11.1% (9/81) of patients were in sustained GC-free remission in TCZ and MTX group, respectively (p value <0.001). At month 24 of follow-up, at least one relapse of the disease occurred in 7/31 (22.6%) in TCZ-treated and 28/81 (34.6%) in MTX-treated patients, respectively (p value = 0.22). TCZ allowed a faster discontinuation of steroid therapy than MTX in GCA patients, without increasing the risk of relapse.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedGiant Cell ArteritisMethotrexateAgedFemaleGlucocorticoidsHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsMaleMiddle AgedRemission InductionRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedGlucocorticoidsImmunosuppressive AgentsMethotrexatetocilizumabDMARDsGiant cell arteritisGlucocorticoidsMethotrexateSteroid sparingTocilizumab

Identifiers

PMID39093541
PMCPMC11582127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.