Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39093441›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2024

The management of critical bone defects: outcomes of a systematic approach.

Shao-Ting Jerry Tsang, Adrian Jansen van Rensburg, Jason van Heerden, Gadi Zwe Epstein, Rudolph Venter, Nando Ferreira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. How Emerging Nanomaterials are Effective in Bone Regeneration?International journal of nanomedicine · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Letter to the editor regarding "the management of critical bone defects: outcomes of a systematic approach".European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025
    Article
  12. Advancing Nanomedicine: For Bone Defect Repair and Regeneration.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shao-Ting Jerry TsangDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, 7505, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9862-8503
Adrian Jansen van RensburgDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, 7505, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6341-0734
Jason van HeerdenDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, 7505, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-9363-3721
Gadi Zwe EpsteinDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, 7505, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4753-5024
Rudolph VenterDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, 7505, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0022-6969
Nando FerreiraDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, 7505, South Africa. nferreira@sun.ac.za.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0567-3373

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe reconstruction of segmental long bone defects remains one of 'The holy grails of orthopaedics'. The optimal treatment of which remains a topic of great debate. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes following the management of critical-sized bone defects using a classification-based treatment algorithm.

methodsA retrospective review of all patients undergoing treatment for segmental diaphyseal defects of long bones at a tertiary-level limb reconstruction unit between January 2016 and December 2021, was performed. The management of the bone defect was standardised as per the classification by Ferreira and Tanwar (2020).

resultsA total of 96 patients (mean age 39.8, SD 15.2) with a minimum six months follow-up were included. Most bone defects were the result of open fractures (75/96) with 67% associated with Gustilo-Anderson IIIB injuries. There was a statistical difference in the likelihood of union between treatment strategies with more than 90% of cases undergoing acute shortening and bone transport achieving union and only 72% of cases undergoing the induced membrane technique consolidating (p = 0.049). Of those defects that consolidated, there was no difference in the time to bone union between strategies (p = 0.308) with an overall median time to union 8.33 months (95% CI 7.4 - 9.2 months). The induced membrane technique was associated with a 40% risk of sepsis.

conclusionThis study reported the outcomes of a standardised approach to the management of critical-sized bone defects. Whilst overall results were supportive of this approach, the outcomes associated with the induced membrane technique require further refinement of its indications in the management of critical-sized bone defects. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4:

Indexed as

Fractures, OpenAdultAlgorithmsBone TransplantationFemaleFracture Fixation, InternalFracture HealingHumansMaleMiddle AgedPlastic Surgery ProceduresRetrospective StudiesTibial FracturesTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultCritical bone defectsOpen fractureReconstruction techniques

Identifiers

PMID39093441
PMCPMC11377594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.