ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2024
Adverse obstetric outcomes in cases of meconium-stained amniotic fluid complicated with intrapartum fever.
Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictors of adverse neonatal outcomes in low-risk nulliparous women at term with meconium-stained amniotic fluid.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2026Article
- Impact of Thin and Thick Intrapartum Meconium-Stained Amniotic Fluid on Cesarean Delivery and Neonatal Outcomes in Low-Risk Pregnancies.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- Impact of meconium-stained amniotic fluid thickness on maternal infectious morbidity: a comprehensive clinical and microbiological analysis.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeMeconium-stained amniotic fluid (MSAF) often signifies colonization of the amniotic sac by microorganisms. This study investigated additional adverse obstetric outcomes associated with MSAF in deliveries complicated by maternal intrapartum fever (IF).
methodsThis retrospective study included all singleton pregnancies from 2014 to 2020, with intrapartum maternal fever ≥ 38 °C during a trial of labor. In accordance with departmental protocol, all patients received intravenous antibiotic therapy consisting of ampicillin and gentamicin in the absence of allergies to these medications. Subsequent antibiotic therapy was adjusted based on the culture results. Antibiotic treatment was discontinued postpartum after 48 h without fever. Swab cultures were obtained immediately postpartum from both the maternal and fetal sides of the placenta. Maternal and fetal outcomes, along with positive placental cultures, were compared between participants with MSAF&IF and those with clear amniotic fluid &IF (control group).
resultsIn comparison to the control group (n = 1089), the MSAF&IF group (n = 264) exhibited significantly higher rates of cesarean delivery (CD) (p = 0.001), CD due to non-reassuring fetal heart rate (p = 0.001), and cord pH ≤ 7.1 (p = 0.004). Positive swab cultures from the placental maternal and fetal sides were more prevalent among the MSAF&IF group (23.1% vs. 17.6%, p = 0.041 and 29.2% vs. 22.9%, p = 0.032, respectively). Placental cultures yielding gastrointestinal pathogens and extended spectrum beta-lactamase were notably more common in the MSAF&IF group compared to controls (p = 0.023). However, there was no significant difference between groups regarding the rate of group B streptococcus positive placental cultures.
conclusionsWomen experiencing IF and MSAF during labor face an elevated risk of CD compared to those with IF alone. The presence of MSAF heightens the risk of positive placental cultures, particularly with gastrointestinal and extended spectrum beta-lactamase pathogens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39093332What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.