Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39093079›Full record

Trial reportJournal of Parkinson's disease2024

Digital Intervention Promoting Physical Activity in People Newly Diagnosed with Parkinson's Disease: Feasibility and Acceptability of the Knowledge, Exercise-Efficacy and Participation (KEEP) Intervention.

Ledia Agley, Peter Hartley, Danielle Duffill, Arshi Iqbal, Alistair Mackett, Kirsten L Rennie, Louise Lafortune

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of Parkinson's disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ledia AgleyDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Peter HartleyDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Danielle DuffillDepartment of Neurological Conditions, Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Arshi IqbalDepartment of Physiotherapy, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Alistair MackettDepartment of Medicine for the Elderly, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Kirsten L RennieMRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Louise LafortuneDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Exercise promotion interventions for people with Parkinson's disease (PD) are often offered on a face-to-face basis, follow a generic "one-size-fit-all" approach, and are not typically delivered at diagnosis. Considering PD's heterogenous nature, the existing evidence on the merits of exercise on symptom management and the expressed wishes of people living with PD for access to timely and tailored evidence-based information, there is a demand for interventions that are easily accessible, scalable and co-designed with people living with PD. Objective: Evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a co-designed digital intervention promoting exercise and physical activity, in people newly diagnosed with PD. Methods: Thirty people living with PD for less than one year participated in an assessor-blinded randomized feasibility trial from June 2022 to April 2023. The intervention group received the 8-week Knowledge, Exercise Efficacy and Participation (KEEP) intervention comprising 6 interactive digital modules and 4 online live group discussions facilitated by a specialist physiotherapist. Assessments were performed at baseline, post intervention and at 6-month follow up. Results: Thirty participants were recruited to target with a 64% recruitment rate (30/47). All but one participant completed the 6-month follow-up assessment. There was high retention (97%), module completion (91%), and online discussion attendance (88%). Outcome measure collection was feasible, including accelerometer data with a daily average wear time of 23.9 hours (SD:0.295). Conclusions: The KEEP intervention was feasible and acceptable in people newly diagnosed with PD. A larger trial is needed to assess intervention efficacy and correlation between knowledge, self-efficacy, and activity levels.

Indexed as

ExerciseFeasibility StudiesParkinson DiseaseAgedExercise TherapyFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PromotionHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CareSelf Efficacyco-designdigital healthexercise promotionfeasibility studyParkinson’s diseasePhysical activityphysical literacy

Identifiers

PMID39093079
PMCPMC11380294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.