Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39092933›Full record

ArticleACS nano2024

Distribution of Single-Particle Resonances Determines the Plasmonic Response of Disordered Nanoparticle Ensembles.

Zachary M Sherman, Delia J Milliron, Thomas M Truskett

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS nano, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zachary M ShermanDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Washington, 3781 Okanogan Lane, Seattle, Washington 98195, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9798-287X
Delia J MillironMcKetta Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, 200 E Dean Keeton Street, Austin, Texas 78712, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8737-451X
Thomas M TruskettMcKetta Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, 200 E Dean Keeton Street, Austin, Texas 78712, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6607-6468

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding how colloidal soft materials interact with light is crucial to the rational design of optical metamaterials. Electromagnetic simulations are computationally expensive and have primarily been limited to model systems described by a small number of particles-dimers, small clusters, and small periodic unit cells of superlattices. In this work we study the optical properties of bulk, disordered materials comprising a large number of plasmonic colloidal nanoparticles using Brownian dynamics simulations and the mutual polarization method. We investigate the far-field and near-field optical properties of both colloidal fluids and gels, which require thousands of nanoparticles to describe statistically. We show that these disordered materials exhibit a distribution of particle-level plasmonic resonance frequencies that determines their ensemble optical response. Nanoparticles with similar resonant frequencies form anisotropic and oriented clusters embedded within the otherwise isotropic and disordered microstructures. These collectively resonating morphologies can be tuned with the frequency and polarization of incident light. Knowledge of particle resonant distributions may help to interpret and compare the optical responses of different colloidal structures, correlate and predict optical properties, and rationally design soft materials for applications harnessing light.

Indexed as

collective plasmon resonancecolloidal gelsdisorderelectromagnetic simulationslocalized surface plasmon resonance

Identifiers

PMID39092933
PMCPMC11328183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.