Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39092843›Full record

Observational studyCritical care explorations2024

Decreased Long-Term Survival of Patients With Newly Diagnosed Cancer Discharged Home After Unplanned ICU Admission: A Prospective Observational Study.

Ana Paula Agnolon Praça, Antônio Paulo Nassar Junior, Alexandre Miras Ferreira, Pedro Caruso

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Critical care explorations, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Impact of intensive care unit admission on the resumption of treatment in patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ana Paula Agnolon PraçaIntensive Care Unit, A.C.Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil.
Antônio Paulo Nassar JuniorIntensive Care Unit, A.C.Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil.
Alexandre Miras FerreiraIntensive Care Unit, A.C.Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil.
Pedro CarusoIntensive Care Unit, A.C.Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1051-8458

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

IMPORTANCE AND

objectivesTo compare the 18-month survival between patients with newly diagnosed cancer discharged home after early unplanned ICU admission and those without early unplanned ICU admission; we also evaluated the frequency and risk factors for early unplanned ICU admission.

designObservational study with prospectively collected data from September 2019 to June 2021 and 18 months follow-up.

settingSingle dedicated cancer center in São Paulo, Brazil.

participantsWe screened consecutive adults with suspected cancer and included those with histologically proven cancer from among 20 highly prevalent cancers.

interventionsNone. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsThe exposure was early unplanned ICU admission, defined as admission for medical reasons or urgent surgery during the first 6 months after cancer diagnosis. The main outcome was 18-month survival after cancer diagnosis, and the main analysis was Cox's proportional hazards model adjusted for confounders and immortal time bias. Propensity score matching was used in the sensitivity analysis. We screened 4738 consecutive adults with suspected cancer and included 3348 patients. Three hundred twelve (9.3%) had early unplanned ICU admission, which was associated with decreased 18-month survival both in the unadjusted (hazard ratio, 4.03; 95% CI, 2.89-5.62) and adjusted (hazard ratio, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.29-2.64) models. The sensitivity analysis confirmed the results because the groups were balanced after matching, and the 18-month survival of patients with early ICU admission was lower compared with patients without early ICU admission (87.0% vs. 93.9%; p = 0.01 log-rank test). Risk factors for early unplanned ICU admission were advanced age, comorbidities, worse performance status, socioeconomic deprivation, metastatic tumors, and hematologic malignancies.

conclusionsPatients with newly diagnosed cancer discharged home after early unplanned ICU admission have decreased 18-month survival compared with patients without early unplanned ICU admission.

Indexed as

Intensive Care UnitsNeoplasmsPatient DischargeAdultAgedBrazilFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient AdmissionProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesRisk FactorsSurvival Analysis

Identifiers

PMID39092843
PMCPMC11299991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.