ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2024
A new biomechanical model of the mammal jaw based on load path analysis.
Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The role of bioactive molecules in enhancing bone healing in oral and maxillofacial surgery: a review of current approaches and future directions.Oral and maxillofacial surgery · 2026Review
- Finite element analysis of primary healing implants with different transmucosal designs.Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists · 2026Article
- A new biomechanical model of the mammal jaw based on load path analysis.The Journal of experimental biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The primary function of the tetrapod jaw is to transmit jaw muscle forces to bite points. The routes of force transfer in the jaw have never been studied but can be quantified using load paths - the shortest, stiffest routes from regions of force application to support constraints. Here, we use load path analysis to map force transfer from muscle attachments to bite point and jaw joint, and to evaluate how different configurations of trabecular and cortical bone affect load paths. We created three models of the mandible of the Virginia opossum, Didelphis virginiana, each with a cortical bone shell, but with different material properties for the internal spaces: (1) a cortical-trabecular model, in which the interior space is modeled with bulk properties of trabecular bone; (2) a cortical-hollow model, in which trabeculae and mandibular canal are modeled as hollow; and (3) a solid-cortical model, in which the interior is modeled as cortical bone. The models were compared with published in vivo bite force and bone strain data, and the load paths calculated for each model. The trabecular model, which is preferred because it most closely approximates the actual morphology, was best validated by in vivo data. In all three models, the load path was confined to cortical bone, although its route within the cortex varied depending on the material properties of the inner model. Our analysis shows that most of the force is transferred through the cortical, rather than trabecular bone, and highlights the potential of load path analysis for understanding form-function relationships in the skeleton.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.